dodsal hydrocarbones power t ltd 2 others vs hasmukh bhagwaji masrani 2012 tzhccomd 50 11 june 2012
The amended plaint, reply to written statement of defence, and supporting affidavits were fatally defective for bearing scanned signatures and lacking proper verification clauses, in disregard of prior court orders. The applicants failed to cure defects as ordered, and the subsequent filing of a second application for interim injunction constituted duplication and abuse of process. Both applications and the main suit were struck out with costs.
- Citation
- dodsal hydrocarbones power t ltd 2 others vs hasmukh bhagwaji masrani 2012 tzhccomd 50 11 june 2012
- Parties
- Plaintiff/applicant: DODSAL HYDROCARBONES & POWER TANZANIA LTD; Plaintiff/applicant: DODSAL RESOURCES & MINING ITILIMA BUSILI (TANZANIA) PVT; Plaintiff/applicant: DODSAL RESOURCES & MINING ITING (TANZANIA) PVT LIMITED; Defendant/respondent: HASMUKH BHAGWAJI MASRANI
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objections and Applications
- Outcome
- Suit and applications struck out with costs
- Legal Topics
- Defective Pleadings, Verification Clause, Scanned Signatures, Court Fees, Affidavit Defects, Abuse of Process, Interim Injunctions
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DODSAL HYDROCARBONES & POWER TANZANIA LTD
Plaintiff/applicant
DODSAL RESOURCES & MINING ITILIMA BUSILI (TANZANIA) PVT
Plaintiff/applicant
DODSAL RESOURCES & MINING ITING (TANZANIA) PVT LIMITED
Plaintiff/applicant
HASMUKH BHAGWAJI MASRANI
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Commercial Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objections and Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether amended pleadings bearing scanned signatures and lacking proper verification clauses are fatally defective
- 2 Whether failure to pay court fees for annextures in amended pleadings is fatal
- 3 Whether affidavits in support of applications bearing scanned signatures are defective
Ratio Decidendi
The amended plaint, reply to written statement of defence, and supporting affidavits were fatally defective for bearing scanned signatures and lacking proper verification clauses, in disregard of prior court orders. The applicants failed to cure defects as ordered, and the subsequent filing of a second application for interim injunction constituted duplication and abuse of process. Both applications and the main suit were struck out with costs.
Court Disposition
Suit and applications struck out with costs
Orders
- Amended plaint and amended reply to written statement of defence struck out
- Affidavits of Mr. Rajen A. Kilachand (15 March 2012) and Mr. Raphael Sikira (27 March 2012) expunged from record
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment