Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

REGINA EDWARD LOWASSA

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The petitioner has complied with all legal requirements for appointment as administrator, and no objection or caveat has been lodged within the statutory period after publication of citation; therefore, the petitioner is entitled to be appointed as administrator of the estate.

Court disposition

Petition granted

Orders

  • Regina Edward Lowassa appointed as administrator of the estate of Edward Ngoyai Lowassa
  • Administrator to exhibit inventory and file final account of the estate within six months from the date of the ruling

02

Material facts

Parties

Regina Edward Lowassa

Petitioner Counsel: Andrew Moses Maganga

Edward Ngoyai Lowassa (deceased)

Deceased

Amounts and remedies

  • Time for Filing Inventory and Final Account: 6

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Probate and Administration Cause / Ruling on Petition for Grant of Letters of Administration

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The petitioner is the wife of the deceased, was recommended by a family meeting, the deceased died intestate, no will has been found, no similar application exists, all procedural requirements and publications have been complied with, and no objections have been lodged.
Respondent
No respondent or objection was presented.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Rule 76 of the Probate Rules, Government Notice No. 369 of 1963

    No probate or letters of administration shall be granted until after the expiration of fourteen days from the date of the last publication of citation and unless no caveat or objection has been lodged during that period.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The petitioner has complied with all legal requirements for appointment as administrator, and no objection or caveat has been lodged within the statutory period after publication of citation; therefore, the petitioner is entitled to be appointed as administrator of the estate.

Court disposition

Petition granted

  • Regina Edward Lowassa appointed as administrator of the estate of Edward Ngoyai Lowassa
  • Administrator to exhibit inventory and file final account of the estate within six months from the date of the ruling

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 16 August 2024

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 16 August 2024

REGINA EDWARD LOWASSA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA

ARUSHA SUB REGISTRY

AT RUSHA PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION CAUSE NO. 14953 OF 2024

IN THE MATTER OF THE PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATE ACT [CAP 352 R.E. 2002]

IN THE MATTER OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE ESTATE OF THE

LATE EDWARD NGOYAI LOWASSA

AND

IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF LETTERS OF

ADMINISTRATION BY REGINA EDWARD LOWASSA

PETITION FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION WHEN THE

DECEASED DIED INTERSTATE

RULING 2nd & 18th September,2024 KAINDA, J.: The petitioner herein is a wife of the late Edward Ngoyai Lowassa who died interstate at JKCI, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es salaam- Tanzania on 10th Day of February,2024. She is seeking before this court for the grant of probate under Section 56 of the Probate and Administration of Estate Act, [Cap 352 R.E. 2002]. At the hearing of this application, the petitioner was represented by Mr. Andrew Moses Maganga, learned counsel. The petitioner was also present in person. Mr. Maganga submitted that the deceased is survived by Regina Edward Lowassa (the Petitioner) who is the wife/spouse of the deceased and the following children; Frederick Lowassa, Pamella Masomi Lowassa, Ada Kichiku Lowassa, Robert Francis Lowassa and Richard Talalai Lowassa. To ascertain the jurisdiction of this court, the petitioner implored that at the time of death, the deceased had a fixed place of abode at Arusha and his properties within the jurisdiction of this court. He argued that on the 30th April,2024, the petitioner was recommended to be administratrix of the estate of the deceased through a clan/ family meeting as per the minutes of the meeting annexed to the application as annex A2. The deceased left several assets which are likely to come into the hands of the petitioner as mentioned in paragraph 4 of the petition. He further argued that the

deceased died interstate and due diligence search for a will was conducted but none has so far been found and that they are not aware of any similar application for the grant of letters in any court of law. In compliance with Rule 75 and 76 of the Probate Rules, Government Notice No. 369 of 1963, Publication of citation for the grant of the application was made on the Government Gazette issue No. 33 of 16th August, 2024 and on 'Mwananchi' Newspaper Dated 5th July,2024. Further, in compliance to Rules 65,66,75(1), 67, and 69 of Probate Rules (supra), the petitioner has attached to the petition the following documents; Oath to administer the estate faithfully, Consent of each of the five children of the deceased, administration bond by sureties and Certificates as to sureties' financial position. Mr. Maganga went on and argued that, since no objection has so far been lodged, he prayed for this court to grant the application so as to allow the petitioner to collect and distribute the estate of the deceased. My consideration of this petition, being guided by the pleadings on record and the submissions by the counsel for the petitioner, I am convinced that the petitioner has complied with legal requirement for one to be appointed administrator of deceased' estate. From the record, neither objection nor caveat has been lodged in court against the grant of the probate. Rule 76 of the

Probate Rules provides; " Where a general citation is required to be published by these Rules or by the court no probate ofa will or letters ofadministration shall be granted until after the expiration offourteen days from the date of the last publication of such citation and unless no caveator objection has been lodged during that period." In this matter, the general citation was published in the Government Gazette No. 33 of 16th July, 2024 and Mwananchi Newspaper dated 5th July,2024. To date, more than seventy (70) days have lapsed and no objection nor caveat was lodged in this court. In the event therefore, this court respectively proceed to appoint the petitioner, Regina Edward Lowassa to administer the estate of the late Edward Ngoyai Lowassa to be performed under the law by exhibiting the inventory and file final account of the estate of the deceased within the period of six (6) months from the date of this ruling. It is so ordered. 9^^ S. J. KAINDA

JUDGE 18.9.2024. Ruling delivered under my hand and seal of this court in Chambers this 18th day of September,2024 in the presence of Mr. Andrew Moses Maganga, learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner was also present in person. S. J. KAINDA

JUDGE 18.9.2024.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Probate and Administration of Estate Act [Cap 352 R.E. 2002]

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Probate Rules, Government Notice No. 369 of 1963

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.