Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

in the matter of the estate of the late dr antony paschal bulengo and in the matter of application for letters of administration by mr david elikisa bulengo 2021 tzhc

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The petitioner is entitled to probate as executor since the will is valid, the deceased was of sound mind, and no contrary evidence was established.

Court disposition

Probate granted

Orders

  • Petitioner granted letters of probate as executor of deceased's estate
  • Executor to administer estate in accordance with the will
  • Executor to file inventory within six months
  • Executor to present final accounts after twelve months
  • Court may extend time if deemed fit

02

Material facts

Parties

Mr. David Elikisa Bulengo

Petitioner Counsel: Mr. Mwanili Habibu Mahimbali

Dr. Antony Paschal Bulengo

Deceased

Amounts and remedies

  • Shares in Upper Zonal Trading Limited: 17,196
  • Shares to Amal Moses Bulengo: 8,598
  • Shares to Cornelia Mikaela Bulengo: 8,598

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Probate and Administration Cause / Ruling on Application for Grant of Probate

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Petitioner sought grant of probate as executor named in the deceased's will, supported by affidavit, verification, death certificate, and will.
Respondent
No respondent or objection presented.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Mohamed Hassani v. Mayasa Mzee and Mwanahawa Mzee (1994) TLR 225 (CAT)

    Deceased's wishes in a valid will should be respected unless contrary is strongly established.

  2. 02

    Vaghella v Vaghella [1999] 2 EA 351

    Executor's suitability and soundness of mind of testator at making of will.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The petitioner is entitled to probate as executor since the will is valid, the deceased was of sound mind, and no contrary evidence was established.

Court disposition

Probate granted

  • Petitioner granted letters of probate as executor of deceased's estate
  • Executor to administer estate in accordance with the will
  • Executor to file inventory within six months
  • Executor to present final accounts after twelve months
  • Court may extend time if deemed fit

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 1 January 2021

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 1 January 2021

in the matter of the estate of the late dr antony paschal bulengo and in the matter of application for letters of administration by mr david elikisa bulengo 2021 tzhc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (IN THE DISTRICT REGISTRY OF ARUSHA)

AT ARUSHA PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION CAUSE NO. 34 OF 2021 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE DR. ANTONY PASCHAL BULENGO............................................................................ DECEASED

AND

IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF PROBATE BY MR. DAVID ELIKISA BULENGO................................ PETITIONER

RULING 08/12/2021 & 20/12/2021 GWAE, J In this Probate Cause, I am asked to grant probate in favour of the petitioner, Mr. David Elikisa Bulengo so that he may be able to be an executor of the estate of his late Dr. Antony Paschal Bulengo (hereinafter to be referred to as deceased) who died on the 24th February 2021 at Mount Meru Hospital in Arusha Region and he had a fixed place of abode at Arusha and his properties subject of execution are in Arusha. The said deceased is said to have named the petitioner, the deceased's son in the last will as the executor of the gross assets namely; 17,196 shares at Upper Zonal Trading Limited of Arusha which are to be divided to the grandchildren of the deceased person that is ordinary shares 8,598 to one Amal Moses Bulengo and 8,598 ordinary shares to one Cornelia Mikaela Bulengo. This Probate is duly supported by the petitioner's verification for petition, the petitioner's affidavit as to the deceased's domicile, executor's oath, deceased's death certificate and the will dated 28th December 2020 On the 8th December 2021 this matter was called on for hearing before me, the petitioner was represented by Mr. Mwanili Habibu Mahimbali, the learned counsel who practicing as Amal Advocates. He sought grant of this probate cause. Basing on the petition together with its accompanying documents particularly deceased person's will appointing the

petitioner as the executor of his shares in the said Company, I have seen no reason to depart from the deceased's wishes which should be respected unless the contrary is strongly established. In the absence of the contrary to the will, petitioner is therefore found to be suitable person of being the executor of the said deceased's estate and that at the making of the will the deceased was sound and that, he was knew the nature and extent of property he was disposing of (See Mohamed Hassani v. Mayasa Mzee and Mwanahawa Mzee (1994) TLR 225 (CAT) and Vaghella v Vaghella [1999] 2 EA 351 In the light of foregoing reasons, the petitioner David Elikisa Bulengo is thus granted letters of probate as the executor of the said estate (shares) of his late father, Antony Paschal Bulengo in favour of the deceased's grandchildren named in the will. The executor is hereby directed to administer the deceased's estate in accordance with the will. He is further requested to make and exhibit an inventory of the deceased's estate to this court within six (6) months from the date of this order and present final accounts after twelve (12) months from the date of the ruling. However, extension of time may made by this court when it deems fit and just to do so. It is so ordered. M.R. GWAE

JUDGE 20/12/2021 COURT: Mention on 23/6/2022 for ascertainment of the filing of the inventory by the administrators and^any related matters.

JUDGE 20/12/2021

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Mohamed Hassani v. Mayasa Mzee and Mwanahawa Mzee (1994) TLR 225 (CAT)

Case cited

Vaghella v Vaghella [1999] 2 EA 351

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.