in the matter of the estate of the late dr antony paschal bulengo and in the matter of application for letters of administration by mr david elikisa bulengo 2021 tzhc
- Citation
- in the matter of the estate of the late dr antony paschal bulengo and in the matter of application for letters of administration by mr david elikisa bulengo 2021 tzhc
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 1 January 2021
- Posture
- Probate and Administration Cause / Ruling on Application for Grant of Probate
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 1 January 2021
- Posture
- Probate and Administration Cause / Ruling on Application for Grant of Probate
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The petitioner is entitled to probate as executor since the will is valid, the deceased was of sound mind, and no contrary evidence was established.
Court disposition
Probate granted
Orders
- Petitioner granted letters of probate as executor of deceased's estate
- Executor to administer estate in accordance with the will
- Executor to file inventory within six months
- Executor to present final accounts after twelve months
- Court may extend time if deemed fit
02
Material facts
Parties
Mr. David Elikisa Bulengo
Petitioner Counsel: Mr. Mwanili Habibu MahimbaliDr. Antony Paschal Bulengo
DeceasedAmounts and remedies
- Shares in Upper Zonal Trading Limited: 17,196
- Shares to Amal Moses Bulengo: 8,598
- Shares to Cornelia Mikaela Bulengo: 8,598
03
Procedural history
Posture
Probate and Administration Cause / Ruling on Application for Grant of Probate
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the petitioner is entitled to be granted probate as executor of the deceased's estate
- 02
Whether the will is valid and should be respected
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Petitioner sought grant of probate as executor named in the deceased's will, supported by affidavit, verification, death certificate, and will.
- Respondent
- No respondent or objection presented.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Mohamed Hassani v. Mayasa Mzee and Mwanahawa Mzee (1994) TLR 225 (CAT)
Deceased's wishes in a valid will should be respected unless contrary is strongly established.
- 02
Vaghella v Vaghella [1999] 2 EA 351
Executor's suitability and soundness of mind of testator at making of will.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The petitioner is entitled to probate as executor since the will is valid, the deceased was of sound mind, and no contrary evidence was established.
Court disposition
Probate granted
- Petitioner granted letters of probate as executor of deceased's estate
- Executor to administer estate in accordance with the will
- Executor to file inventory within six months
- Executor to present final accounts after twelve months
- Court may extend time if deemed fit
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 1 January 2021
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 1 January 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (IN THE DISTRICT REGISTRY OF ARUSHA)
AT ARUSHA PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION CAUSE NO. 34 OF 2021 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE DR. ANTONY PASCHAL BULENGO............................................................................ DECEASED
AND
IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF PROBATE BY MR. DAVID ELIKISA BULENGO................................ PETITIONER
RULING 08/12/2021 & 20/12/2021 GWAE, J In this Probate Cause, I am asked to grant probate in favour of the petitioner, Mr. David Elikisa Bulengo so that he may be able to be an executor of the estate of his late Dr. Antony Paschal Bulengo (hereinafter to be referred to as deceased) who died on the 24th February 2021 at Mount Meru Hospital in Arusha Region and he had a fixed place of abode at Arusha and his properties subject of execution are in Arusha. The said deceased is said to have named the petitioner, the deceased's son in the last will as the executor of the gross assets namely; 17,196 shares at Upper Zonal Trading Limited of Arusha which are to be divided to the grandchildren of the deceased person that is ordinary shares 8,598 to one Amal Moses Bulengo and 8,598 ordinary shares to one Cornelia Mikaela Bulengo. This Probate is duly supported by the petitioner's verification for petition, the petitioner's affidavit as to the deceased's domicile, executor's oath, deceased's death certificate and the will dated 28th December 2020 On the 8th December 2021 this matter was called on for hearing before me, the petitioner was represented by Mr. Mwanili Habibu Mahimbali, the learned counsel who practicing as Amal Advocates. He sought grant of this probate cause. Basing on the petition together with its accompanying documents particularly deceased person's will appointing the
petitioner as the executor of his shares in the said Company, I have seen no reason to depart from the deceased's wishes which should be respected unless the contrary is strongly established. In the absence of the contrary to the will, petitioner is therefore found to be suitable person of being the executor of the said deceased's estate and that at the making of the will the deceased was sound and that, he was knew the nature and extent of property he was disposing of (See Mohamed Hassani v. Mayasa Mzee and Mwanahawa Mzee (1994) TLR 225 (CAT) and Vaghella v Vaghella [1999] 2 EA 351 In the light of foregoing reasons, the petitioner David Elikisa Bulengo is thus granted letters of probate as the executor of the said estate (shares) of his late father, Antony Paschal Bulengo in favour of the deceased's grandchildren named in the will. The executor is hereby directed to administer the deceased's estate in accordance with the will. He is further requested to make and exhibit an inventory of the deceased's estate to this court within six (6) months from the date of this order and present final accounts after twelve (12) months from the date of the ruling. However, extension of time may made by this court when it deems fit and just to do so. It is so ordered. M.R. GWAE
JUDGE 20/12/2021 COURT: Mention on 23/6/2022 for ascertainment of the filing of the inventory by the administrators and^any related matters.
JUDGE 20/12/2021
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.