in the matter of the estate of the late michael ngaleku shirima and in the matter of application for probate by christian ngaleku shirima 2023 tzhc 23827 13 december 2
- Citation
- in the matter of the estate of the late michael ngaleku shirima and in the matter of application for probate by christian ngaleku shirima 2023 tzhc 23827 13 december 2
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 1 January 2023
- Posture
- Probate and Administration Cause / Ruling on Petition for Probate and Appointment of Executor
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 1 January 2023
- Posture
- Probate and Administration Cause / Ruling on Petition for Probate and Appointment of Executor
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
Petitioner satisfied all statutory requirements for grant of probate, citation was properly published, no caveat was lodged, thus probate is granted and petitioner appointed executor.
Court disposition
Petition granted; petitioner appointed executor.
Orders
- Petitioner Christian Charles Shirima appointed to execute the will of Michael Ngaleku Shirima.
- Petitioner to exhibit inventory and final account of the estate within six months from date of appointment.
- Mention set for 12/06/2024 for ascertainment of filing of inventory.
02
Material facts
Parties
Christian Charles Shirima
PetitionerEstate of Michael Ngaleku Shirima
DeceasedAmounts and remedies
- Bank Accounts: TZS 82,000,000
- Bank Accounts: KSH 800,000
- Bank Accounts: USD 85,000
- Real Estate: TZS 1,740,000,000
- DSE Shares: TZS 4,001,300,000
- NSE Shares: TZS 59,000,000
- Shares at Other Company: TZS 1,759,610,000
- Peugeot Motor Vehicle: TZS 4,000,000
- Toyota Land Cruiser Motor Vehicle: TZS 40,000,000
- Personal Effects: TZS 9,000,000
- Household Properties: TZS 5,000,000
- Total Estate Value: TZS 7,056,610,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Probate and Administration Cause / Ruling on Petition for Probate and Appointment of Executor
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the petitioner satisfies legal requirements for grant of probate and appointment as executor
- 02
Whether proper notice and citation procedures were followed
- 03
Whether any caveat was lodged against the petition
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Petitioner submitted that all legal requirements and procedures for probate were satisfied, citation published in government gazette and newspaper, no caveat lodged, prayed for grant of probate and appointment as executor.
- Respondent
- No respondent appeared or opposed; no caveat lodged.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Probate and Administration of Estate Act Cap 352 R.E 2002, sections 38, 55, 56, 57(1),(2), 65, 66; Probate Rules 33, 34, 50, 64
Grant of probate requires compliance with statutory procedures, publication of citation, and absence of caveat.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
Petitioner satisfied all statutory requirements for grant of probate, citation was properly published, no caveat was lodged, thus probate is granted and petitioner appointed executor.
Obiter and limits
- Application for administrator pendente lite is redundant since main probate application is determined.
Court disposition
Petition granted; petitioner appointed executor.
- Petitioner Christian Charles Shirima appointed to execute the will of Michael Ngaleku Shirima.
- Petitioner to exhibit inventory and final account of the estate within six months from date of appointment.
- Mention set for 12/06/2024 for ascertainment of filing of inventory.
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 1 January 2023
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 1 January 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA ARUSHA SUB-REGISTRY
AT ARUSHA PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION CAUSE NO. 19 OF 2023
IN THE MATTER OF ESTATE OF THE LATE MICHAEL NGALEKU SHIRIMA ............................................................ DECEASED
AND
IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION FOR PROBATE BY
CHRISTIAN CHARLES SHIRIMA PETITIONER
RULING 12/12/2023 & 13/12/2023. D. D. NDUMBARO, J A petitioner petitioned for appointment as administrator pendente lite and order to grant probate of the Estate of Michael Ngaleku Shirima who died testate. The court was moved under the provision of sections 38 and 55 of Probate and Administration of Estate Act Cap 352 R.E 2002 respectively; Probate rule 50, accompanied by necessary documents to satisfy requirements of the petition for probate under sections 56, 57(1), (2), 65,66 and rules 33, 34, and 64 as to affidavit as to domicile executors' oath and copy of will and death certificate respectively. i Records show the deceased was Christian survived by four children Vincent, Victor, Sylvia and Christian and other beneficiaries as Mike Shirima, Patricia T. Shirima, Paulina T. Shirima, Evodia D. Mrosso, Marcelina Shirima, Frederica Shirima, Ferdinand Shirima, Adolfina Kitally, Hillaly Shirima, Rosada Kimario and Emerensiana Harold. Deceased left properties listed under the will (in annexure C to the petition), as ten Bank accounts listed in description A worth TZS 82,000,000, KSH 800,000, and USD 85,000; Real estate listed in description B valued at TZS 1,740,000,000; DSE Shares listed in description C valued at TZS 4,001,300,000; NSE Shares listed in description valued at TZS 59,000,000; Shares at other Company listed in description E valued at TZS 1,759,610,000; two Motor
vehicles listed in description F as Peugeot valued TZS 4,000,000 and Toyota Land Cruser valued 40,000,000; personal effects listed in description G valued 9,000,000 and household properties listed in description H valued 5,000,000. All with an approximate value of 7,056,610,000. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the citation was published in the government gazette on 6th October 2023 and in the Nipashe newspaper on 25th September 2023. During submission, the counsel for the 2 petitioner argued, considering that no caveat was made against the partitioner's appointment, pray this court grants the application for probate and appoints the petitioner as an administrator of the estate of Michael Ngaleku Shirima. In the executors' oath, petitioners demonstrated willingness, faithfulness and awareness of the duties as executor of the deceased will according to the deceased wishes by paying his debt and legacies first and distributing residue thereafter according to the law, and he will be responsible for making exhibit fully and true inventory of the said property and credit in courts within six months from the date of grant to be made to him within such time as the court may appoint, and render true account of his administration within one year from the same date or within such time as court from time to time may appoint. The will which the petitioner intends to execute
was witnessed by Laura Paul Macha and Edlin Tango Advocates. Upon considering the petitioners' application on all legal requirements and all procedures as to citing the notice in the official government gazette on 6th October, 2023 and in the Nipashe newspaper on 25th September 2023 3 was adhered to, and since fourteen days from the date of publication lapse, and no caveat was lodged before this court, I do hereby grant the petition. The petitioner Christian Charles Shirima is hereby appointed to Execute the will of Michael Ngaleku Shirima and shall perform his legal duties under law by exhibiting inventory and final account of the estate of the deceased within the period of six months from the date of appointment. Since the main application on probate is determined, the application of administrator pendente lite is redundant. DATED AT ARUSHA this 13th day of December, 2023. D.D. NDUMBARO
JUDGE COURT: Mention on 12/06/2024 for ascertainment of the filling of the inventory by the executor. । D.D. NDUMBARO
JUDGE 13/12/2023 4
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.