Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

in the matter of the estate of the late devota nambi kijogoo and in the matter of the application for the a grant of probate by florah adam kijogoo 2024 tzhc 340 21 fe

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The affidavit submitted by the petitioner did not comply with Rule 63(3) of the Probate Rules, as it was not from a person who witnessed the interment or cremation, nor from a duly registered medical practitioner in the country where the deceased died; thus, the petition is incompetent.

Court disposition

Petition struck out as incompetent

Orders

  • Petition for grant of probate struck out for non-compliance with Rule 63(3) of the Probate Rules

02

Material facts

Parties

Florah Adam Kijogoo

Petitioner Counsel: Ms. Jesse Mnguto

Devota Nambi Kijogoo

Deceased

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Probate and Administration Cause / Ruling on Application for Grant of Probate

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The original death certificate could not be located as it was transported with the deceased's body from India and went missing; an affidavit and a photocopy of the certificate were submitted in lieu thereof.
Respondent
No respondent appeared or argued; the court considered the legal sufficiency of the affidavit provided.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Rule 63(3) of the Probate Rules, 1963

    Rule 63(3) of the Probate Rules requires an affidavit from a person who witnessed the interment or cremation, or from a duly registered medical practitioner in the country where the deceased died, if the original death certificate is unavailable.

  2. 02

    Section 55(1) of the Probate and Administration of Estates Act, Cap 352, R.E 2019; Rule 33(1)(b) of the Probate Rules, 1963

    Petitions for probate must comply with mandatory documentary requirements, including proper proof of death.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The affidavit submitted by the petitioner did not comply with Rule 63(3) of the Probate Rules, as it was not from a person who witnessed the interment or cremation, nor from a duly registered medical practitioner in the country where the deceased died; thus, the petition is incompetent.

Court disposition

Petition struck out as incompetent

  • Petition for grant of probate struck out for non-compliance with Rule 63(3) of the Probate Rules

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 1 January 2024

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 1 January 2024

in the matter of the estate of the late devota nambi kijogoo and in the matter of the application for the a grant of probate by florah adam kijogoo 2024 tzhc 340 21 fe

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA TEMEKE SUB-REGISTRY (ONE-STOP JUDICIAL CENTRE)

AT TEMEKE PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION CAUSE NO. 92 OF 2023

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE

DEVOTA NAMBI KIJOGOO

AND

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR A GRANT OF PROBATE BY

FLORAH ADAM KIJOGOO

RULING 22nd January & 21st February, 2024 BARTHY, J. Before this court, Florah Adam Kijogoo has filed a petition for a grant of probate with a will annexed to administer the estate of her late sister, Devota Nambi Kijogoo, who passed away in India on the 16th of November 2022. Upon issuance and proper publication of the general citation, this court discovered that the petitioner did not possess the original death certificate i of the deceased. Consequently, the court issued an order requiring the presentation of the original death certificate before this court. On the 22nd of January 2024, Ms. Jesse Mnguto, counsel for the petitioner, appeared and addressed the court regarding the missing original death certificate. Ms. Mnguto argued that the original death certificate of the deceased could not be located. Therefore, the petitioner lodged an affidavit pursuant to section 56(1) and 70(a) of the PAEA and rules 32 and 39 of the Probate Rules, attaching all necessary documents. Ms. Mnguto further explained that the death certificate was transported along with the deceased's body from India, where she was receiving treatment before her passing. However, the original death certificate could not be found thereafter. Consequently, the petitioner decided to lodge this petition using a photocopy and filed the affidavit to substantiate the deceased's passing. This court, having heard Ms.

Mnguto's argument, is tasked with determining the propriety of this petition before the court without the original death certificate of the deceased. The petition for probate is governed by section 55(1) of the Probate and Administration of Estates Act, Cap 352, R.E 2019 (PAEA), and rule 33(l)(a) to (d) of the Probate Rules, 1963. According to rule 33(1) (b), the 2 death certificate is required to be among the attachments, subject to rule 63 of the Rules. As rule 63(2) of Probate Rules provides; "Where, for any reason beyond die control of die peddoner, a death certificate is not available, the petitioner shall file in lieu thereof an affidavit from a person who saw the remains of die deceased being interred or cremated or an affidavit from a medical practitioner, duly registered as such in the country where the deceased died, who pronounced the death of the deceased". The above section addresses the situation in which the original death certificate is lost or unavailable, as in this case. It is evident that rule 63(3) of the Probate Rules is a mandatory provision, as it employs the term "shall" and mandates the petitioner to file an affidavit from a person who witnessed the interment or cremation of the deceased, or an affidavit from a duly registered medical practitioner in the country where the deceased passed away. In the present case, the petitioner submitted her

affidavit, supported by a copy of the death certificate, stating in paragraph 3 that the certificate 3 was prepared by hospital authorities in Bangalore and issued in November 2022, but went missing after the arrival of the body. The provision of Rule 63(3) of the Probate Rules explicitly requires an affidavit from a person who witnessed the interment or cremation of the deceased, or an affidavit from a duly registered medical practitioner in the country. It is evident that the petition for the grant of probate letters is not properly before this court, as the affidavit provided to prove the death of the deceased does not meet the legal requirement. Therefore, the appropriate remedy is to strike out the petition for being incompetent. It is so ordered. Dated at Dar es Salaam this 21st of February, 2024. Delivered in the presence of the petitioner in person and Ms. Mnguto the counsel for the petitioner. 4

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Probate and Administration of Estates Act, Cap 352, R.E 2019

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Probate Rules, 1963

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.