fadhili tewa said vs amina tewa said and another 2020 tzhc 3333 30 october 2020
- Citation
- fadhili tewa said vs amina tewa said and another 2020 tzhc 3333 30 october 2020
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 30 October 2020
- Posture
- Probate and Administration Cause / Ruling on Procedural Irregularity Before Hearing
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 30 October 2020
- Posture
- Probate and Administration Cause / Ruling on Procedural Irregularity Before Hearing
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
There was a procedural irregularity in not converting the matter into a suit with proper pleadings after caveators entered appearance; to cure this, the proceedings must be converted into a suit, assigned a civil suit number, and parties directed to file necessary pleadings.
Court disposition
Proceedings converted into a suit; directions for pleadings and appearance before Deputy Registrar; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Proceedings to be treated as a suit with petitioner as plaintiff and caveators as co-defendants.
- Deputy Registrar to assign a civil suit number and direct parties to appear for orders on pleadings.
- Parties to appear before Deputy Registrar on 5th November 2020 for necessary orders.
- No order as to costs.
02
Material facts
Parties
Fadhili Tewa Said
PetitionerAmina Tewa Said
1st CaveatorCity Properties Limited
2nd Caveator03
Procedural history
Posture
Probate and Administration Cause / Ruling on Procedural Irregularity Before Hearing
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the proceedings complied with the procedural requirements for contentious probate matters
- 02
Whether the case should be converted into a suit with proper pleadings
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Applicant's counsel argued that there is a procedural irregularity as the case file should have been assigned a new number and parties given time to file necessary pleadings before hearing, relying on Monica Nyamakare Jigamba v Mugeta Bwie Bakhome and 2 Others.
- Respondent
- Counsel for the first and second caveators supported the applicant's argument regarding the procedural irregularity.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Rule 82(6) of the Probate Rules, G.N No. 369 of 1963
Where a caveator enters an appearance, the proceedings shall be numbered as a suit and the Registrar shall appoint a date for orders as to pleadings and hearing.
- 02
Monica Nyamakare Jigamba v Mugeta Bwie Bakhome and 2 Others, Civil Application No. 199/01 of 2019 (unreported)
Procedures for contentious probate matters must be strictly followed.
- 03
Section 52(b) and 59 of the Probate and Administration of Estates Act, Cap 352
Relevant statutory provisions govern the administration of estates and contentious proceedings.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
There was a procedural irregularity in not converting the matter into a suit with proper pleadings after caveators entered appearance; to cure this, the proceedings must be converted into a suit, assigned a civil suit number, and parties directed to file necessary pleadings.
Court disposition
Proceedings converted into a suit; directions for pleadings and appearance before Deputy Registrar; no order as to costs.
- Proceedings to be treated as a suit with petitioner as plaintiff and caveators as co-defendants.
- Deputy Registrar to assign a civil suit number and direct parties to appear for orders on pleadings.
- Parties to appear before Deputy Registrar on 5th November 2020 for necessary orders.
- No order as to costs.
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 30 October 2020
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 30 October 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY)
AT DAR ES SALAAM PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION CAUSE NO. 45 OF 2018
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE TEWA SAID TEWA
AND
IN THE MATTER FOR APPLICATION FOR LETTERS OF
ADMINISTRATION BY FADHILI TEWA SAID
PETITION FOR GRANT IN RESPECT OF UNADMINISTERED ASSETS
BETWEEN FADHILI TEWA SAID..................................................... PETITIONER
VERSUS AMINA TEWA SAID..................................................... 1st CAVEATOR CITY PROPERTIES LIMITED....................................... 2nd CAVEATOR
RULING MASABO, J. In this matter the applicant has applied for letters of administrator of an unadministered asset of the late Tewa Said Tewa. The application is contentious, having been contested by Amina Tewa Said as first caveator and City Properties Limited as 2nd Caveator. Individual citation for each of the cavetors were duly issued pursuant to Rule 82 (3) of the Probate Rules and both entered appearance by filing affidavit as per Rule 82(4), thus the pleadings at this stage were complete. Today, the matter was scheduled for hearing. Prior to commencement of hearing, the counsel for the applicant referred me to the decision of the 1 JLMasabo Court of Appeal in Monica Nyamakare Jigamba v Mugeta Bwie Bakhome and 2 Others, Civil Application No. 199/01 of 2019 (unreported) in which the procedures applicable in a contentious probate were emphatically articulated. Based on this he argued that, there is a procedural irregularity which needs to be cured before the matter proceeds to hearing. The irregularity is that, the case file ought to have been assigned a new number and the parties ought to have been given time to file necessary pleadings before appearing before judge for hearing. The counsel for the first and second caveators were also in support. Upon consideration of the submissions made by the parties and guided by the authority above cited and the provision of section
52(b) and 59 of the Probate and Adminstration of Estates Act, Cap 352, and Rule 82 (6) of the Probate Rules, G.N No. 369 of 1963, which states that: "Where a caveator enters an appearance the proceedings shall be numbered as a suit and the Registrar shall appoint a date upon which the suit shall be listed before a Judge in Court for such orders as to pleadings and date of the hearing as the Judge may make," I am of the view that, indeed there is an irregularity. To cure the irregularity, it is ordered as follows: i. The present proceedings shall turn into a suit to which the petitioner Fadhil Tewa Said shall forthwith be the plaintiff whereas the 2 JLMasabo caveators, Amina Tewa Said and City Properties Limited shall be co defendants; ii. The pleadings shall be assigned a civil suit number by the Deputy Registrar who shall thereafter direct the parties to appear before judge for necessary orders as to the special pleadings to be filed; iii. The parties are to appear before the Deputy Registrar on 5th November 2020 for necessary orders iv. There are no orders as to costs. DATED at DAR ES SALAAM this 30th October 2020. J.L. MASABO
JUDGE 3 JLMasabo
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.