tsn oil tanzania limited others vs equity bank t limited another 2023 tzhccomd 361 3 november 2023
The Plaintiffs repaid all credit facilities to the Defendants using funds from Barak Fund. The SBLC Facility dated 26 March 2018 did not take effect as the secured event (a written loan agreement between all Plaintiffs and Barak Fund) never materialized, and no valid SBLC was issued under that facility. The Defendants' refusal to discharge collaterals after repayment constituted a breach. The Defendants' counterclaims failed for lack of proof and because the underlying facilities were not enforceable. The Plaintiffs are entitled to discharge of all collaterals, declaratory reliefs, general damages, and costs.
- Citation
- tsn oil tanzania limited others vs equity bank t limited another 2023 tzhccomd 361 3 november 2023
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: TSN Oil Tanzania Limited; 2nd Plaintiff: TSN Supermarket Limited; 3rd Plaintiff: TSN Logistics Limited; 4th Plaintiff: TSN Distributors Limited; 1st Defendant: Equity Bank (T) Limited; 2nd Defendant: Equity Bank (K) Limited
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 3 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Case / Judgment After Full Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Plaintiffs; Defendants' counterclaims dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Loan Facility Agreements, Standby Letters of Credit (sblc), Mortgage Discharge, Foreign Loan Registration, Breach of Contract, Counterclaims in Banking Disputes
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TSN Oil Tanzania Limited
1st Plaintiff
TSN Supermarket Limited
2nd Plaintiff
TSN Logistics Limited
3rd Plaintiff
TSN Distributors Limited
4th Plaintiff
Equity Bank (T) Limited
1st Defendant
Equity Bank (K) Limited
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Case / Judgment After Full Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Plaintiffs repaid all credit facilities to the Defendants and are entitled to discharge of collaterals
- 2 Whether the SBLC Facility dated 26 March 2018 took effect and was breached
- 3 Whether the Defendants are entitled to enforce the SBLC or recover under it
Ratio Decidendi
The Plaintiffs repaid all credit facilities to the Defendants using funds from Barak Fund. The SBLC Facility dated 26 March 2018 did not take effect as the secured event (a written loan agreement between all Plaintiffs and Barak Fund) never materialized, and no valid SBLC was issued under that facility. The Defendants' refusal to discharge collaterals after repayment constituted a breach. The Defendants' counterclaims failed for lack of proof and because the underlying facilities were not enforceable. The Plaintiffs are entitled to discharge of all collaterals, declaratory reliefs, general damages, and costs.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Plaintiffs; Defendants' counterclaims dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Declaration that Defendants breached obligations by refusing to discharge collaterals after repayment.
- Declaration that the SBLC Facility dated 26 March 2018 did not take effect and was not renewed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment