Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

Criminal Session Case 28293 of 2024 Judgment MrishaJ

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The accused was convicted of manslaughter on his own plea of guilty. The sentence was mitigated due to the circumstances of the offence, including provocation by the deceased, the accused's lack of prior criminal record, and his guilty plea, resulting in a five-year prison sentence.

Court disposition

Convicted on plea of guilty; sentenced to five years imprisonment.

Orders

  • Accused sentenced to five years imprisonment for manslaughter.

02

Material facts

Parties

Republic

Prosecution Counsel: Mr. Kizito Kitandala

Paschal Charles Bundala @ Cash Money

Accused Counsel: Mr. Eliud Ngao

Amounts and remedies

  • Prison Sentence: years 5

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Session Case / Sentencing After Plea of Guilty to Substituted Charge

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The defence requested a lenient sentence, citing the accused's guilty plea, lack of previous criminal record, youth, family responsibilities, repentance, and the deceased's contributory conduct leading to the fight.
Respondent
The prosecution requested a serious punishment due to the nature of the offence and the fact that the deceased left behind two young children, but acknowledged the accused had no previous criminal record.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    General sentencing principles

    A guilty plea and lack of previous criminal record are mitigating factors in sentencing.

  2. 02

    Judicial discretion under Penal Code

    Provocation and contributory conduct by the deceased may be considered in mitigation.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The accused was convicted of manslaughter on his own plea of guilty. The sentence was mitigated due to the circumstances of the offence, including provocation by the deceased, the accused's lack of prior criminal record, and his guilty plea, resulting in a five-year prison sentence.

Obiter and limits

  • The court hopes the accused will become a good citizen and sensitize others about the need to abide by the law.

Court disposition

Convicted on plea of guilty; sentenced to five years imprisonment.

  • Accused sentenced to five years imprisonment for manslaughter.

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 1 January 2024

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 1 January 2024

Criminal Session Case 28293 of 2024 Judgment MrishaJ

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (SUMBAWANGA DISTRICT REGISTRY)

SITTING AT SUMBAWANGA CRIMINAL SESSION CASE NO. 28293 OF 2024 (Originated from Resident Magistrate Court ofKatavi in P.I. 23249 of2024)

REPUBLIC

VERSUS PASCHAL CHARLES BUNDALA @ ACCUSED JUD 2fth February & 03d March, MRISHA, J. Before ed son Paschal Charles Bundala @Cash Mon was miti rr^igned for the information of Murder contrary to section and of the Penal Code [Cap 16 R.E. 2022] (the Penal Code). Howe information in respect of that homicide offence was later substituted to that of Manslaughter contrary to section 195 and 198 of the Penal Code following the prayer of the said accused through his i advocate Mr. Eliud Ngao which was not objected by Mr. Kizito Kitandala, learned Senior State Attorney representing the respondent Republic. Subsequently thereto, the above-named accused person pleaded guilty to the abovementioned lesser offence. He also admitted to the correctness of the facts of the case which were read over and explained to the accused person to the effect that: The accused person was charged with the offence of Manslaughter after kiliing Miza Nyanda @ Minza Nyanda, the incident which happened on 14th day of November, 2020 at Kamini Suburb, Katambike village within Mpanda District in Tatavi Region. W The accused and the deceased person one Miza Nyanda @ Minza Nyanda, were husband and wife living together with their children including Dulu Elisha at Katambike Village within Mpanda District and in Katavi Region. On 14th November, 2020 at or about 2020 hours while at Katambike Village within Mpanda District

and in the Region of Katavi, the accused person and his family were inside their house where the accused and the deceased fell into a quarrel and started fighting. 2 In the cause of fighting, the accused person grabbed an axe and assaulted the deceased on the neck and the deceased fell down unconsciously. Thereafter, the accused person run away leaving the deceased without any help. Dulu Elisha who is the deceased’s daughter, was e and when such fight was going on, she witnessed everything aid electric solar light which was illuminating inside r in the morning she informed her uncle one out the incident. Msekwa Nyanda who info the s an ogether they went to the crime scene where t fo ased body lying on the floor with serious cu un information was supplied to the village leade nda ice station. That on the material date at or about 0800 hours, poli ficers led by SP Maria D. Kwayi, went at the crime scene togeth the medical practitioner one Adam Mnyawi. A police offi H.411 DC Ainea drew a sketch map of the crime scene. That on the same day an autopsy of the deceased body was conducted by Dr. Adam Mnyawi and according to the Report on Post-mortem Examination, it shows that the cause of death was due to Severe 3 Traumatic Brain Injury and Hypertension (Shock) secondary to severe blood loss. The accused person was traced in vain since 2020 until when he was arrested on the 1st day of

August 2024 at Kambuzi hoti Village. He was then taken to Mpanda Police Station. That on the same day the accused person was interrogated by a police officer one F.7433 D/SGT Abdallah by way of cautioned statement where he admitted to have committed the offence As indicated above, upo ing read over to him, the accused person confirmed to th hose facts are correct and he admitted to them. Consequently, the court found him guilty of the offence of manslaughter contrary to section 195 and 198 of the Penal Code, and accordingly convicted him on his own plea of guilty. Thereafter, both counsel for the prosecution Republic and the defence side made their s ons regarding the aggravating and mitigating factors all of which I have to considered in the course of assessing the proper sentence to be imposed upon the above-named accused person. The 4 prosecution attorney has informed the court that the Republic has no previous criminal records about the accused person herein. However, he has implored me to pass a serious punishment to the accused person by considering the nature of offence committed. He further submitted that the deceased has left behind two young children who needed her guidance and upbringing and that big On the other side, the learned defence counsel has submitted a prayer that his client be given a lenient punishm at apart from the fact that he pleaded guilty to er

offence, thus serving the time of the court and parties, th no previous criminal records. He further submitted that the deceased person had sexual relationship with another man who caused a fight, thus leading to her death; hence, she contributed to her death. It is also his submission that the accused person is young man of 38 years old, he has one child and wife, hence, he needs to support his family. The accused person repents on what he has done, he confessed and pleaded guilty to the offence charged. 5 There is no doubt that the above-named accused person is responsible for the killing of the deceased person and for that basis, there is no way he can escape from the consequences of being incarcerated due to his guiltiness, as specified above. However, having considered both the aggravating an itigating factors as briefly stated above, it is my settled view that nd hose criminal conduct was done under circums ould not be done had the deceased person no to mmission of such criminal act which would ny r nable spouse upon finding the accused had s another man something which caused fight b e m; I f the view that the said accused person is entitled to enie entence. Thus ing ons, I hereby sentence the accused person Pasch Charles n a @ Cash Money to serve a prison sentence of five years opping that after completion of that term, he will be a good citizen in the society and able to sensitize members of his society about the need to abide to the laws of the land and be aware of the consequences of taking the law into their hands. 6 It is so ordered. A.A. MRISHA

JUDGE 03.03.2025

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Penal Code [Cap 16 R.E. 2022] sections 195 and 198

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.