Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

republic vs elvans so cyprian luvundu 2005 tzhc 171 15 april 2005

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The accused unlawfully killed the deceased by strangulation in the course of domestic violence, and drunkenness is not a valid excuse. The seriousness of domestic violence and the need for deterrence outweigh mitigating factors, warranting a severe sentence.

Court disposition

Convicted on plea of guilty; sentenced to imprisonment for twenty years.

Orders

  • Accused convicted of manslaughter under section 195 of the Penal Code.
  • Accused sentenced to twenty years imprisonment.
  • Right of appeal explained.

02

Material facts

Parties

Republic

Prosecution Counsel: Miss Choma

Elyan s/o Cyprian Luvindu

Accused Counsel: Mr. Kariwa

Amounts and remedies

  • Sentence Length: 20

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Sessions Case / Conviction and Sentencing Upon Plea of Guilty

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The defence requested leniency, citing the accused's status as a first offender, youth, drunkenness at the time of offence, guilty plea, time already spent in remand, and dependants.
Respondent
The prosecution accepted the plea to manslaughter and presented facts establishing unlawful killing by strangulation in the context of domestic violence.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania

    Right to life is protected by the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania; domestic violence is not a lawful cause for taking life.

  2. 02

    Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Violence against Women (CEDAW)

    Violence against women must be eradicated; Tanzania is a party to CEDAW.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The accused unlawfully killed the deceased by strangulation in the course of domestic violence, and drunkenness is not a valid excuse. The seriousness of domestic violence and the need for deterrence outweigh mitigating factors, warranting a severe sentence.

Obiter and limits

  • There has been a lot of public outcry to stop domestic violence.
  • The court cannot accept the excuse of drunkenness because the accused was warned and stopped but later strangled the deceased.

Court disposition

Convicted on plea of guilty; sentenced to imprisonment for twenty years.

  • Accused convicted of manslaughter under section 195 of the Penal Code.
  • Accused sentenced to twenty years imprisonment.
  • Right of appeal explained.

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 15 April 2005

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 15 April 2005

republic vs elvans so cyprian luvundu 2005 tzhc 171 15 april 2005

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TAANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY)

AT PAR ES SALAAM

ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL SESSIONS CASE NO.48 OF 192003

RE P UB L I C

VERSUS ELY AN S/O CYPRIAN LUVINDU

P R O C E E D I N G S 15/4/2005 CORAM: N.P.KIMARO, J. For the Republic - Miss Choma - State Attorney. For the Defence - Mr. Kariwa. Accused - Present under custody. CC: Julius. Miss Choma: The case was coming for trial. The Republic has four witnesses and we are ready to proceed with the trial. Mr. Kariwa: The defence is ready to enter a plea of guilty to a lesser offence of manslaughter c/s 195 of the Penal Code. Miss Choma: The Republic is ready to accept a plea of manslaughter. Court: Information of manslaughter c/s 195 of the Penal Code is read over to the accused and explained and he is asked to plead thereto. Accused: It is true I killed accidentally. Court: Entered Plea of Guilty. 1 N.P.KIMARO,

JUDGE 15/04/2005 Facts by State Attorney: Your Ladyship the accused is charged with manslaughter c/s 195 of the Penal Code. The accused unlawfully killed one Paulina Peters Beatus on 16/04/2001 at Mbagala which is at Temeke District, Dar es Salaam Region. The accused and the deceased were lovers and they were cohabiting together. On the date of the incident (16/04/2001) the accused and the deceased left their house together at the evening. At about 9.00 p.m. they returned together drunk. The accused was seen kicking the deceased and the deceased fell down. The neighbours and other tenants - among them being Elizabeth Kanika and Juliana Daudi Mrope requested the accused not to beat the deceased. The accused obeyed and stopped beating the deceased. The neighbours carried the deceased to her room where she was living with the accused. They slept her on the floor and left her in the company of the accused. On the next day 17/04/2001 in the morning hours the accused left his room and went to inform the other tenants - among them being Yovina Daudi @ Mrope that he tried to wake up the deceased, 2 but the deceased was not responding. The neighbours went with the accused to his room and found the deceased on the bed and she was motionless. After seeing the situation, relatives of the deceased were Unformed. The police was also informed on that very day. The accused was arrested and

taken to a police station. The body of the deceased was taken to hospital for examination. The Post Mortem Report showed that the cause of death was suffocation due to strangulation. The Post Mortem Examination Report has already been admitted in court as exhibit PI. The Sketch Plan was also made. I tender the same as exhibit. Court: Sketch Plan exhibit P2. The accused was then charged for the unlawful killing. Accused: The facts are correct. Court: The accused is convicted on his own plea of guilty and admission of the fact leading to the commission of the offence. N.P.KIMARO,

JUDGE 15/04/2005 State Attorney: No previous record. Mitigation by Mr. Kariwa: 3 1 I pray for leniency because he is a first offender. The accused is a young person and he was involved in the commission of the offence because of drunkenness. He has pleaded guilty and so he has saved the court's time and costs. The accused has been in remand for more than four years. He has already served part of his sentence. He has dependants. I pray to the court to take into consideration all the above factors and exercise leniency on the accused. Sentence: While I accept that under normal circumstances the factors given by the Defence Council are good mitigating factors, in this case the accused deserves a severe punishment. This is because the offence was committed in the course of domestic violence. The deceased is one of those women who have lost their lives because of domestic violence. The Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania safeguards the right to life. No one is allowed to take away the life of another person without a lawful cause. Domestic violence is not a lawful course. Besides, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Violence against Women (CEDAW) requires that violence against women should be eradicated. Tanzania is a party to the convention. There has been a lot of public outcry to stop domestic violence. In this case apart from the accused kicking the deceased, he strangled her. This court cannot accept the excuse of drunkenness because the accused was once warned not to kick the deceased and he stopped. Later on he strangled the deceased to death. Considering 4 this fact that the offence was committed in the course of domestic violence, I sentence the accused to an imprisonment for twenty years. N.P.KIMARO,

JUDGE 15/04/2005 Right of Appeal is explained. N.P.KIMARO,

JUDGE 15/04/2005 5

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Penal Code section 195

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.