ibrahim twahili kusundwa and another vs crdb bank limited alias crdb bank plc and 3 others 2020 tzhclandd 2273 31 august 2020
The 1st plaintiff defaulted on the deed of settlement by failing to pay the agreed annual installments. The mortgagee's power of sale was not extinguished by the deed of settlement or court order. Proper statutory notice was served to the 1st plaintiff, and the auction was lawfully conducted. The 3rd and 4th defendants are bonafide purchasers for value and entitled to mesne profits from the date of purchase. The plaintiffs' continued occupation after the sale was wrongful.
- Citation
- ibrahim twahili kusundwa and another vs crdb bank limited alias crdb bank plc and 3 others 2020 tzhclandd 2273 31 august 2020
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Ibrahim Twahili Kusundwa; 2nd Plaintiff: Ibrahim Twahili Kusundwa (Administrator of the estate of the late Twahili Selemani Kusundwa); 1st Defendant: CRDB Bank Limited alias CRDB Bank PLC; 2nd Defendant: MEM Auctioneers and General Brokers Ltd; 3rd Defendant: Epimaki S. Makoi; 4th Defendant: Prim A. Mushi
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 31 August 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Land Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' suit dismissed; counterclaim by 3rd and 4th defendants succeeds.
- Legal Topics
- Mortgage, Power of Sale, Auction Procedure, Mesne Profits, Default Notice, Bonafide Purchaser, Counterclaim
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ibrahim Twahili Kusundwa
1st Plaintiff
Ibrahim Twahili Kusundwa (Administrator of the estate of the late Twahili Selemani Kusundwa)
2nd Plaintiff
CRDB Bank Limited alias CRDB Bank PLC
1st Defendant
MEM Auctioneers and General Brokers Ltd
2nd Defendant
Epimaki S. Makoi
3rd Defendant
Prim A. Mushi
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1st plaintiff defaulted the terms of deed of settlement executed on 16th September 2013 between the 1st plaintiff and the 1st defendant.
- 2 Whether the purported sale of the mortgaged/disputed property by the 1st and 2nd defendants to the 3rd and 4th defendant was in exercise of the power of sale under mortgage or under the deed of settlement and whether the sale was lawful.
- 3 Whether the 3rd and 4th defendants are the bonafide purchasers of the disputed/mortgaged properties.
Ratio Decidendi
The 1st plaintiff defaulted on the deed of settlement by failing to pay the agreed annual installments. The mortgagee's power of sale was not extinguished by the deed of settlement or court order. Proper statutory notice was served to the 1st plaintiff, and the auction was lawfully conducted. The 3rd and 4th defendants are bonafide purchasers for value and entitled to mesne profits from the date of purchase. The plaintiffs' continued occupation after the sale was wrongful.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' suit dismissed; counterclaim by 3rd and 4th defendants succeeds.
Orders
- Plaintiffs' suit dismissed with costs.
- 3rd and 4th defendants declared lawful owners of the suit property (Plot No. 13, Block 30 Nyamwezi Street Kariakoo Area, Certificate of Title 32350).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment