REPUBLIC VERSUS SADICK SAID JUDGMENT

REPUBLIC VERSUS SADICK SAID JUDGMENT

The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that Sadiki S/O Said, acting with others, unlawfully caused the death of Mushema S/O Masunga with malice aforethought. Identification evidence and confession were reliable and corroborated. The accused's alibi was unsupported and failed to raise reasonable doubt.

Citation
REPUBLIC VERSUS SADICK SAID JUDGMENT
Parties
Prosecution: The Republic; Accused: Sadiki S/O Said
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sessions Case / Final Judgment and Sentencing
Outcome
Conviction and sentence
Legal Topics
Murder, Burden of Proof, Identification Evidence, Confession, Malice Aforethought
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 7 Authorities cited 20 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Republic

Prosecution

Sadiki S/O Said

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sessions Case / Final Judgment and Sentencing

  1. 1 Whether the accused caused the death of the victim with malice aforethought
  2. 2 Whether the prosecution proved the case beyond reasonable doubt
  3. 3 Whether identification and confession evidence were reliable

Ratio Decidendi

The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that Sadiki S/O Said, acting with others, unlawfully caused the death of Mushema S/O Masunga with malice aforethought. Identification evidence and confession were reliable and corroborated. The accused's alibi was unsupported and failed to raise reasonable doubt.

Court Disposition

Conviction and sentence

Orders

  • Sadiki S/O Said convicted of murder contrary to sections 196 and 197 of the Penal Code, Cap 16 R.E. 2019.
  • Sadiki S/O Said sentenced to death by hanging until he dies.