open society justice initiative v cote divoire communication 31806 2015 achpr 1 28 february 2015
Côte d’Ivoire’s nationality laws and practices, particularly the doctrine of 'ivoirité' and the vagueness of the nationality code, resulted in discrimination against persons of Dioula origin and others, denial of nationality, and statelessness, violating Articles 1, 2, 3, 5, 12, 13, 14, 15, 18, and 22 of the African Charter. The legislative reforms undertaken did not fully remedy these violations, as they failed to provide clear definitions, adequate procedures, or retroactive and effective remedies for affected persons. The State is required to amend its constitution and laws, implement effective administrative and judicial remedies, and provide redress for victims.
- Citation
- open society justice initiative v cote divoire communication 31806 2015 achpr 1 28 february 2015
- Parties
- Complainant: Open Society Justice Initiative; Respondent State: Republic of Côte d’Ivoire
- Court
- ACHPR
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Communication (individual Complaint) Before the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights / Merits Decision After Admissibility and Full Submissions
- Outcome
- Complaint upheld; violations found.
- Legal Topics
- Nationality, Statelessness, Discrimination, Equality Before the Law, Right to Dignity, Freedom of Movement, Political Participation, Right to Property, Right to Work, Family Protection, Right to Development
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Open Society Justice Initiative
Complainant
Republic of Côte d’Ivoire
Respondent State
Procedural Posture
Communication (individual Complaint) Before the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights / Merits Decision After Admissibility and Full Submissions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Côte d’Ivoire’s nationality laws and practices violated the African Charter by discriminating against persons of Dioula ethnic origin and others, resulting in statelessness and denial of fundamental rights.
- 2 Whether the legislative and administrative reforms undertaken by Côte d’Ivoire remedied the alleged violations.
Ratio Decidendi
Côte d’Ivoire’s nationality laws and practices, particularly the doctrine of 'ivoirité' and the vagueness of the nationality code, resulted in discrimination against persons of Dioula origin and others, denial of nationality, and statelessness, violating Articles 1, 2, 3, 5, 12, 13, 14, 15, 18, and 22 of the African Charter. The legislative reforms undertaken did not fully remedy these violations, as they failed to provide clear definitions, adequate procedures, or retroactive and effective remedies for affected persons. The State is required to amend its constitution and laws, implement effective administrative and judicial remedies, and provide redress for victims.
Court Disposition
Complaint upheld; violations found.
Orders
- Côte d’Ivoire must amend Articles 35 and 65 of its Constitution to comply with Articles 2 and 13 of the Charter.
- Côte d’Ivoire must ensure its nationality law is consistent with Articles 2 and 5 of the Charter, the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, and the UN Conventions on Statelessness.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment