abbas abdallah ishabailu vs bhrithi mining pvt ltd 3 others 2023 tzhcld 1311 8 june 2023

abbas abdallah ishabailu vs bhrithi mining pvt ltd 3 others 2023 tzhcld 1311 8 june 2023

The application sought to revise an interlocutory order which did not finally determine the rights of the parties; therefore, the High Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the application under Rule 50 of the Labour Court Rules.

Citation
abbas abdallah ishabailu vs bhrithi mining pvt ltd 3 others 2023 tzhcld 1311 8 june 2023
Parties
Applicant: Abbas Abdallah Ishabailu; 1st Respondent: Bhrithi Mining PVT Ltd; 2nd Respondent: Bhumi Mining Ltd; 3rd Respondent: Bhavani Rajesh Varma Pericharla; 4th Respondent: Said Abdallah Hamoud
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
8 June 2023
Procedural Posture
Labour Revision / Judgment on Application for Revision
Outcome
Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Legal Topics
Revision, Interlocutory Orders, Jurisdiction, Service of Process, Extension of Time
Source Language
English
Labour Law Revision Interlocutory Orders Jurisdiction Service of Process Extension of Time

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Abbas Abdallah Ishabailu

Applicant

Bhrithi Mining PVT Ltd

1st Respondent

Bhumi Mining Ltd

2nd Respondent

Bhavani Rajesh Varma Pericharla

3rd Respondent

Said Abdallah Hamoud

4th Respondent

Procedural Posture

Labour Revision / Judgment on Application for Revision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the CMA erred in setting aside the ex-parte award
  2. 2 Whether the Respondents were properly served
  3. 3 Whether the application for extension of time was time-barred

Ratio Decidendi

The application sought to revise an interlocutory order which did not finally determine the rights of the parties; therefore, the High Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the application under Rule 50 of the Labour Court Rules.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Orders

  • No order as to costs.