abdallah mohamed vs the republic 2024 tzhc 681 7 march 2024
The applicant, being an inmate, promptly filed a notice of intention to appeal and his movements were curtailed. The period of delay was 105 days. There is a point of law of sufficient importance in the impugned judgment that warrants extension of time under section 361(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act.
- Citation
- abdallah mohamed vs the republic 2024 tzhc 681 7 march 2024
- Parties
- Applicant: Abdallah Mohamed; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 7 March 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure, Prisoners' Rights
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdallah Mohamed
Applicant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has adduced sufficient reason for delay to warrant extension of time to appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant, being an inmate, promptly filed a notice of intention to appeal and his movements were curtailed. The period of delay was 105 days. There is a point of law of sufficient importance in the impugned judgment that warrants extension of time under section 361(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Time for filing appeal extended by 30 days from the date of the ruling
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment