abdallah mohsen malick vs kazimili mlyachuma others 2024 tzca 37 13 february 2024
The appeal was filed out of time because the appellant failed to serve the respondents with a copy of the letter requesting proceedings, making the certificate of delay invalid and the appeal time barred under Rule 90(1) and (3) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009.
- Citation
- abdallah mohsen malick vs kazimili mlyachuma others 2024 tzca 37 13 february 2024
- Parties
- Appellant: Abdallah Mohsen Malick; Respondents: Kazimili Mlyachuma & 18 Others
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 13 February 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- appeal struck out as time barred
- Legal Topics
- Limitation Period, Service of Documents, Appeal Procedure, Land Ownership, Acquiescence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdallah Mohsen Malick
Appellant
Kazimili Mlyachuma & 18 Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal was filed within the prescribed limitation period under the Court of Appeal Rules
- 2 Whether failure to serve the respondents with a copy of the letter requesting proceedings invalidates the certificate of delay and renders the appeal time barred
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was filed out of time because the appellant failed to serve the respondents with a copy of the letter requesting proceedings, making the certificate of delay invalid and the appeal time barred under Rule 90(1) and (3) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009.
Court Disposition
appeal struck out as time barred
Orders
- Appeal struck out for being time barred.
- Respondents awarded costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment