abdallah said vs the managing director arusha international conference center another 2023 tzhc 22595 7 november 2023

abdallah said vs the managing director arusha international conference center another 2023 tzhc 22595 7 november 2023

The applicant failed to demonstrate any point of law or public importance warranting leave to appeal, as the grounds raised were either already addressed by the lower courts or were matters of fact, not law.

Citation
abdallah said vs the managing director arusha international conference center another 2023 tzhc 22595 7 november 2023
Parties
Applicant: Abdallah Said; 1st Respondent: The Managing Director Arusha International Conference Centre; 2nd Respondent: The Arusha International Conference Centre
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
7 November 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Redundancy Agreement, Confidential Documents, Repatriation Costs
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Employment Law Leave to Appeal Redundancy Agreement Confidential Documents Repatriation Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Abdallah Said

Applicant

The Managing Director Arusha International Conference Centre

1st Respondent

The Arusha International Conference Centre

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant demonstrated issues of general importance or novel points of law justifying leave to appeal
  2. 2 Whether the grounds of appeal show a prima facie or arguable appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to demonstrate any point of law or public importance warranting leave to appeal, as the grounds raised were either already addressed by the lower courts or were matters of fact, not law.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application for leave to appeal is dismissed for want of merit
  • Applicant to pay costs