abdallah sospeter mabomba vs republic 2018 tzca 576 11 july 2018

abdallah sospeter mabomba vs republic 2018 tzca 576 11 july 2018

The applicant failed to show good cause for the delay and did not indicate in his application which ground under Rule 66(1)(a)-(e) he intended to rely upon, both of which are mandatory requirements for extension of time.

Citation
abdallah sospeter mabomba vs republic 2018 tzca 576 11 july 2018
Parties
Applicant: Abdallah Sospeter @ Mabomba; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
11 July 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Review
Outcome
dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Review of Appellate Decision, Good Cause for Delay
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Appellate Procedure Extension of Time Review of Appellate Decision Good Cause for Delay

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Abdallah Sospeter @ Mabomba

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown good cause for delay in filing application for review
  2. 2 Whether the applicant's failure to indicate grounds under Rule 66(1)(a)-(e) is fatal to the application

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to show good cause for the delay and did not indicate in his application which ground under Rule 66(1)(a)-(e) he intended to rely upon, both of which are mandatory requirements for extension of time.

Court Disposition

dismissed

Orders

  • Application for extension of time is dismissed.