abduel emmanuel vs medicins sans frontiers 2024 tzhcld 11 19 february 2024
The delay was technical, not actual, as applicant filed the revision within time but withdrew it due to defective verification. Technical delay constitutes sufficient cause for extension of time. Apparent illegality in the arbitrator's ruling further justifies granting the application.
- Citation
- abduel emmanuel vs medicins sans frontiers 2024 tzhcld 11 19 february 2024
- Parties
- Applicant: Abduel Emmanuel; Respondent: Medicins Sans Frontiers
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Revision, Retrenchment, Termination of Employment, Res Judicata
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abduel Emmanuel
Applicant
Medicins Sans Frontiers
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file revision
- 2 Whether technical delay constitutes good cause for extension
- 3 Whether there is apparent illegality in the arbitrator's ruling
Ratio Decidendi
The delay was technical, not actual, as applicant filed the revision within time but withdrew it due to defective verification. Technical delay constitutes sufficient cause for extension of time. Apparent illegality in the arbitrator's ruling further justifies granting the application.
Court Disposition
Application allowed
Orders
- Applicant granted seven days to file intended revision application
- Applicant to file revision on or before 26th February 2024
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment