abdul aziz lalani others vs sadru mangalji 2016 tzhc 2294 18 february 2016

abdul aziz lalani others vs sadru mangalji 2016 tzhc 2294 18 february 2016

Respondent is not a resident of Tanzania and does not possess immovable property in Tanzania; shares in a company do not qualify as immovable property under Order XXV rule 1(1) of the Civil Procedure Code; applicants are entitled to an order for security for costs.

Citation
abdul aziz lalani others vs sadru mangalji 2016 tzhc 2294 18 february 2016
Parties
Applicant: Abdul Aziz Lalani; Applicant: Amin Ramji; Applicant: Mehboob Ramji; Respondent: Sadru Mangalji
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
18 February 2016
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Commercial Cause / Ruling on Application for Security for Costs
Outcome
Application allowed in part
Legal Topics
Security for Costs, Immovable Property, Discretion of Court
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Security for Costs Immovable Property Discretion of Court

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Abdul Aziz Lalani

Applicant

Amin Ramji

Applicant

Mehboob Ramji

Applicant

Sadru Mangalji

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Commercial Cause / Ruling on Application for Security for Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent should be ordered to provide security for costs under Order XXV rule 1(1) of the Civil Procedure Code
  2. 2 Whether shares in a company constitute immovable property for purposes of security for costs

Ratio Decidendi

Respondent is not a resident of Tanzania and does not possess immovable property in Tanzania; shares in a company do not qualify as immovable property under Order XXV rule 1(1) of the Civil Procedure Code; applicants are entitled to an order for security for costs.

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part

Orders

  • Respondent to deposit Tshs. 15,000,000/= as security for costs within twenty-one (21) days from the date of ruling
  • Costs in this application shall be costs in the cause