abdul hamisi vs josephat karoli 2022 tzhc 11768 28 april 2022
The trial tribunal failed to comply with Regulation 12 and did not afford the appellant a fair hearing, violating the principle of natural justice and constitutional right to be heard. The irregularities affected the fairness of the proceedings and cannot be cured by the overriding objective principle or section 45 of the Land Disputes Courts Act.
- Citation
- abdul hamisi vs josephat karoli 2022 tzhc 11768 28 april 2022
- Parties
- Appellant: Abdul Hamisi; Respondent: Josephat Karoli
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Land Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Right to Be Heard, Fair Trial, Regulation Compliance, Natural Justice
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdul Hamisi
Appellant
Josephat Karoli
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was afforded a fair hearing as required by law
- 2 Whether Regulation 12 of the Land Disputes (District and Land Housing Tribunal) Regulations, 2003 was complied with
- 3 Whether the trial tribunal's irregularities affected the fairness of the proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The trial tribunal failed to comply with Regulation 12 and did not afford the appellant a fair hearing, violating the principle of natural justice and constitutional right to be heard. The irregularities affected the fairness of the proceedings and cannot be cured by the overriding objective principle or section 45 of the Land Disputes Courts Act.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Proceedings of the trial tribunal nullified
- Decision and orders of the DLHT quashed and set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment