abdulhamani hassani litoki vs hamisi shabani litoki 2006 tzhc 46 29 june 2006
The court held that the mere fact that the house was bought in the appellant's name does not prove it was a gift; there was no evidence of intention or delivery by the deceased to the appellant. The house forms part of the deceased's estate.
- Citation
- abdulhamani hassani litoki vs hamisi shabani litoki 2006 tzhc 46 29 june 2006
- Parties
- Appellant: Abdulhamani Hassani Litoki; Respondent: Hamisi Shabani Litoki
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2006
- Procedural Posture
- PC Civil Appeal / Judgment on Final Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Administration of Estates, Ownership of Property in Deceased's Estate, Gifts Inter Vivos
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdulhamani Hassani Litoki
Appellant
Hamisi Shabani Litoki
Respondent
Procedural Posture
PC Civil Appeal / Judgment on Final Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether House No. 330 Block 'L' at Kibondemaji Mbagala Zakheim belongs to the appellant or forms part of the deceased's estate
- 2 Whether the respondent was properly appointed as administrator of the deceased's estate
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the mere fact that the house was bought in the appellant's name does not prove it was a gift; there was no evidence of intention or delivery by the deceased to the appellant. The house forms part of the deceased's estate.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Costs awarded to respondent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment