Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

abdulilah ramadhan salmu and others vs republic 2021 tzhc 6219 24 september 2021

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The offences are bailable, the application is uncontested, and there is no evidence or reason to deny bail; therefore, bail is granted subject to statutory and court-imposed conditions.

Court disposition

Application for bail allowed

Orders

  • Applicants to deposit Tshs. 184,000,000/= in court (one half of the alleged pecuniary loss), shared equally (Tshs. 46,000,000/= each), or alternatively deposit a title deed of immovable property of equivalent value within the jurisdiction and free from encumbrances.
  • Each applicant to sign a bond of Tshs. 46,000,000/= for the remaining half of the pecuniary loss.
  • Each applicant to produce two reliable sureties, each surety to sign a bail bond of Tshs. 1,500,000/=. Sureties must be residents of Dar es Salaam or Coastal region with recognized abode and proper identification.
  • Applicants to surrender passports and travel documents (if any).
  • Applicants not to leave Dar es Salaam and Coastal Regions without permission from the Magistrate in charge of Kibaha District Court.
  • Applicants to attend court as scheduled.
  • Resident Magistrate in charge of Kibaha District Court to verify sureties and bail documents.

02

Material facts

Parties

Abdulilah Ramadhan @ Salmu

Applicant Counsel: Alex Mshumbusi

Agustino Michael Kilas @ Juma

Applicant Counsel: Alex Mshumbusi

Aman Norbert @ Michael

Applicant Counsel: Alex Mshumbusi

Masumbuko Juma Mohamed @ Mark

Applicant Counsel: Alex Mshumbusi

The Republic

Respondent Counsel: Sofa Bimbiga

Amounts and remedies

  • Alleged Pecuniary Loss: TZS 368,000,000
  • Bail Deposit Required (total): TZS 184,000,000
  • Bail Deposit Required Per Applicant: TZS 46,000,000
  • Bond Per Applicant for Remaining Half: TZS 46,000,000
  • Surety Bond Per Surety: TZS 1,500,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Bail Application Pending Trial

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicants, through counsel, argued for admission to bail on fair conditions, relying on the uncontested nature of the application and the bailable status of the offences.
Respondent
Respondent did not contest the application but requested the court to consider section 36(5) and (6) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act when setting bail conditions.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 29(4)(a) and (d) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act

    Where the pecuniary loss alleged exceeds the subordinate court's jurisdiction, the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain bail applications under the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act.

  2. 02

    Section 36(1), (5), and (6) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act

    Bail may be granted for bailable offences unless there are reasons to deny it, and conditions must comply with statutory requirements.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The offences are bailable, the application is uncontested, and there is no evidence or reason to deny bail; therefore, bail is granted subject to statutory and court-imposed conditions.

Obiter and limits

  • No evidence was presented that the applicants previously jumped bail.
  • The court must ensure bail conditions comply with statutory requirements and protect the interests of justice.

Court disposition

Application for bail allowed

  • Applicants to deposit Tshs. 184,000,000/= in court (one half of the alleged pecuniary loss), shared equally (Tshs. 46,000,000/= each), or alternatively deposit a title deed of immovable property of equivalent value within the jurisdiction and free from encumbrances.
  • Each applicant to sign a bond of Tshs. 46,000,000/= for the remaining half of the pecuniary loss.
  • Each applicant to produce two reliable sureties, each surety to sign a bail bond of Tshs. 1,500,000/=. Sureties must be residents of Dar es Salaam or Coastal region with recognized abode and proper identification.
  • Applicants to surrender passports and travel documents (if any).
  • Applicants not to leave Dar es Salaam and Coastal Regions without permission from the Magistrate in charge of Kibaha District Court.
  • Applicants to attend court as scheduled.
  • Resident Magistrate in charge of Kibaha District Court to verify sureties and bail documents.

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 24 September 2021

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 24 September 2021

abdulilah ramadhan salmu and others vs republic 2021 tzhc 6219 24 september 2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM REGISTRY)

AT DAR ES SALAAM MISC. CRIM. APPLICATION NO. 198 OF 2021 (Arising from Economic Crime Case No. 05 of 2021 pending before the District Court of Kibaha at Kibaha) ABDULILAH RAMADHAN @ SALMU.......................... 1st APPLICANT AGUSTINO MICHAEL KILAS @JUMA........................ 2ND APPLICANT AMAN NORBERT @ MICHAEL.................................. 3RD APPLICANT MASUMBUKO JUMA MOHAMED @MARK 4TH APPLICANT

VERSUS THE REPUBLIC............................................................ RESPONDENT

RULING Last Order 15/9/2021 Ruling: 17/9/2021 MASABO J.L.:- The application before me is for bail. Through a chamber summons preferred under section 29 (4) (d) and section 36 (1) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act, [Cap. 200 R.E 2019], the applicants pray for admission on bail pending trial in Economic Crime Case No. 05 of 2021 currently pending before the District Court of Kibaha at Kibaha. The application is supported by an affidavit taken by their counsel, one Alex Mshumbusi. It is also supported by a charge sheet from which it is discernible that, they are jointly charged of willfully and unlawfully destroying Standard Gauge Railway Infrastructure by cutting railway copper wire; being found in possession of 50 kgs of the copper wire the property Tanzania Railway Cooperation; and occasioning a pecuniary loss of Tshs 368,000,000/= to the Tanzania Railway 1 Cooperation contrary to sections 326(1) and (6A) and 312(1)(a) of the Penal Code and sections 57(1) and 60 (2) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act [Cap, 200 R.E 2002) (EOCCA). The application was not contested. The Respondent did not file a counter affidavit and when the parties appeared for hearing, Ms. Sofa Bimbiga, the learned State Attorney who appeared on behalf of the Respondent submitted that the Respondent does not intend to object the application but reminded the court to take into

consideration the provision of section 36(5) and (6) of EOCCA when determining the conditions for bail. On his part, Mr. Alex Mshumbusi, the learned counsel for the applicants, having adopted the content of his affidavit, prayed that the application be allowed and the applicants be admitted on bail upon fair conditions. Having gone through the application, I am fortified that the application is well within the jurisdiction of this court because, pursuant to section 29(4) (a) and (d) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act (supra), the application for bail could not be entertained by the District Court of Kibaha as the pecuniary loss of Tshs 368,000,000/= alleged to have been occasioned by the applicants to the Tanzania Railway Corporation exceeds by far the amount of Tshs 10,000,000/= which is the pecuniary bar for subordinate courts in similar applications 2 Considering that the offences facing the applicants are bailable and the application is uncontested and considering further that, no reason has been furnished to this court warranting denial of bail to the applicants and there is no evidence that the applicants were previously granted bail but jumped it, I find no reason why this application should not be allowed. Accordingly, I allow it and order that the applicants be released on bail upon fulfillment of the following conditions: 1. Deposit in court a sum of

Tshs.184,000,000/= which is one half of the pecuniary loss of Tshs 368,000,000/= occasioned to the Tanzania Railway Corporation. As the offences were allegedly committed by 4 persons, this amount shall be equally shared between the applicants whereby each of the applicant shall deposit Tshs. 46,000,000/= only. In the alternative, each of the applicant shall deposit a Title Deed of immovable property of the value not less than Tshs. 46,000,000/= or any other acceptable form of evidence of ownership of that immovable property from the local authority of the area where the property is located. The immovable property shall be within the jurisdiction of the Dar es Salaam Registry of the High Court and shall be free from encumbrances.

2. The remaining half that is, Tshs.184,000,000/= shall be secured by each of the applicants signing a bond of Tshs Tshs. 46,000,000/=.

3. The applicant must produce two (2) reliable sureties and each surety shall sign bail bond in the sum of 1,500,000/=. The sureties must be resident of Dar es Salaam or Coastal region with recognized place of 3 abode and must have National ID or letter of introduction from their local leaders; 4. The applicants shall surrender their passport and other travel documents (if any); 5. The applicants shall not leave Dar es Salaam and Coastal Regions without first obtaining permission from the Magistrate in charge of Kibaha District Court; 6. The applicants shall continue to attend to thie case on the date and time scheduled; 7. The Resident Magistrate in charge of Kibaha District Court shall verify the sureties and all bail documents. Order accordingly. DATED at DAR ES SALAAM this 17th day of September 2021. 17/09/2021 X Signed by: J.L.MASABO J.L. MASABO

JUDGE 4

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Economic and Organized Crime Control Act [Cap. 200 R.E 2019]

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Penal Code

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Economic and Organized Crime Control Act [Cap. 200 R.E 2002]

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.