19951121 TZHC Dar es Salaam

... j . TANZANlA .. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF . . v. AT DAR ES SALA.AM {CORAM: KISANGA, J .A., RAMADHANI, J ,A., And MFALILA; J ~A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5. OF 1994 ... BF!rWEEN . 1. ABDULRASOL AHMED J AFFER I 2. THE NATIONAL HOUSING CORP. f At>l'ELLANTS 3. THE_ RmISTRAR OF TITLES I AND •· • -~~~-~~►A~~~:...ilil1tt4-~•ii~h • --~ - . .a.cl!" •-••i<i;,~. . . .. - .1111 _,fffl lll(d_. . . . .~, f ~ <~~rfo~~~~:ts= ~! -:i~if➔ , .;.•• ,-• ·*--~~-~~~ .. ~ --~~,_,...,..~-•,f<-1';"'-., ,:~PilCl l►l~,.i.:..,,.1~•--)1(~ ,.t. . .ti • • • • •, 19.- . . ' . (Mapieo, J. ) . ~ .. . . . . . da~~d ~e · 1 at~~~~:eal-jp· ,.......~JitJ-~f in .J Miscellaneous Civil A;pPlicatiop No., 48 .·of 1:992 . "' -' ... . ,. "".I '-:•',-Vh•-, JuDG!MENT OF THE CO!]Ig · KISANGA1 J •A,; Parin A.A. Ja:ffer and _her late father Amirali A.. Jaffer had jointly- applied to the High Court for -th~ rectification - . . ~ · of errors in the Land _Register in respect of pa.rticu.l~ relati?l8 to a iong te:c:o. iease of ·appartments. 0101 and 0201' over plot No. 2254 131opk 83 llwi$o/Za.ramo Stree~ situat.e wit~in the - city of Dar es Salaam, · The ~ e n t ~ to tbai>-applioati~ '.'.. ~·:-· were Abdulrasul A.· Ja.fter, The National Houajng Corporation and the R~gistra.r of titles. ., - 2 - Before the hearing of the application commenced a preliminary objection was tak~n on three grounds, namely, that Parin A. Jaffer had no locus standi in the matter, that the application was wrongly. brought before the High Court .•in the first instance and that the appli·cation was time barred~ - ' .. · . ' . , : , , .• '- . :. • ,._ ' . . .:; .• t • 't . ~e High Courl {Ma.pigano, J.) overru.l.ed the objection, end ' .' it 1s tro!t•i~_ ·. -~~p-vp·e":t~:~e~_r "-~~Dtr:t:."~--g~- ,/;~,f.,ii,<,...--v:<. - .y ......""g . I . •• ·.,:..,. ~ j-'!~: ;,. · ~••, • • '. • '·. J •• , ,· {( ' .. •. ·• ; .i <. : ,//If' • • • • ',' . . . ~- -·_; • ~ •• • • • :_ • • • • • - • ....,,f\HlffljldlJ lil■ftlll!*.Jl9'ft~I~!~'··~-). ·· •· • ,:... a._._. ___.,...............vtdW!itt.LWfl,{f1fl ' • • • • • o' • '91!'!M.lllt'fii••n•11i1( . • l .,,,±811"•·.•, 11 .,. ~:r., ......,•••,i....11 •un•rr1111>11111, • 1 ~,.. ~laift~!flMt~r:w .. . n ' ' -·~•!iri••·"'•*i-lllf . w •••• f . . . .IPN •.,. 11111 ~...,. . . . . . ll!llt\rl 4•11~e·· " .,.,, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (INktrllW;ol 1 and that Mr.· Ismail himself' be penni tt~d to drop out of the . · . • ,•' ': .i\~-.,-,1:, • ..,:,:;..,_ .. ', •/ :. , . < t,. , •.. c;,~~ ...... w-',/r.~~"+••-,.• 1., ....,,.:,_.,.::,.,')f",l•',;\.,,.~•,Ji.;.~~·.g..~•.r, ,,._· ,l ,•. ·.,. .· .. ,.. i.,,....-.,.,J,,.')lo--\'d"'~""~'":.t",:~ ~-, ,. • Pf~~~"f~~..J';¼~~J~.,,t~:S.·.~1.~c,...,• •oUiii ,ie~~eJ~i-· •.-,lllM_tr ·. Mr.· Ismai.1.1 s .appl.ication .was granti3d ~coomingly. ..,,...,,... ,i~ ··· Glancing through the record it also transpired that the · .,. f .-l ·'"' .....~ ,.........ti ,1,•>J.:. • ,. ·.,;.. :~.....,., .. ~·:.. ,ii,.,.~ .....-__....-~··'\ f.,..,t_,;.'•.• _.- .. ,i;,._.... ~~,¥',·.....,_~-..;:.-.,9"'"' ;.,.,- ~.~~'<.i·f·~-.,· Registrar ' of Titles did not appeal against the . . Rulil'l& of the High. Court and therefore he·is not a.party.to.this appeal; accordingly we struck off his •name from the record of appeal • . ·.-:. i. -·· ~ The appeal, therefore proceeded in respect of the National . . Hotlsing' Cb~tion as. the ·~ppel1a.tit a.ncf°i1aR.ii' 1~·,i'Jaff~;"':': ~"~ > .~~~ .. , the respondent, being the legal representati~e of her f~ther J · ~•-..~· ....,. 11u,1• Jlid ~ ... ~~'Ii•;: Mtu ~-· J 11•••~l1'1/IIII.J'it flJI_Q a:•c...-e. · ,· · ·•. "'''!bl . . . . . .l.rp;i,, ,1.Aniirali A, Ja:.ff~r who ha.a .since died·, Appearing before tis 0 · . · . were Mr, M:i- ilaiu-··ie~nietl'''8'4W6tte fh:r ·th~'"ii1,~ant. and ,,'.~~~- ·~·-r~:4'61ratff---■~--------···•l1~· J1l.ff~~ .. - 3 Mr. Maira 1 s main ground of appeal was that the High Court erred in failing to dismiss the application before him as being time barred. In his ruling the trial ·judge found t~t the application was time barred but decided, neye~ theless that he had power, acting on his O~_'initiative, .to . ' ·'f . ,,'i. •~· .,.,..,.... , .. . "• _;, < < • extend the period of limitation. It is pert_~ent to .point _ , out here' that there: waano~~·~·.;6r··~veh a su~ntbft:~,,:~-~ 1 ' ~~-~li•••••......,...Jliaiil-li111Mn1111.111~••,~·~ - _" J;....- • • ·, : . • .. ,::~~~•._":.;,_~•.,.I ' • ·• '.,.;#It_-• t • _,;,, --,,, ' ~- , ••• · /j Dri Mapinda who advocated for the appliciant 1n ·the High ·· ',. . .f~-~iii;tf\Ei:ia:£t5:wiZ::::::; timau.s, Nevertheless, ta.kill& up the issu.e b.5,mse1f the : ..·f · ·. _ I' ., • . ' ' ,,,, • '. , • . ,. .• ~ •: . . . )~~ _ ~ :~J'l>rWJh>" ~~ ...·-.· .. ' . ' . .~'i' i-Jl:U~~~~ttwAil'.it~:,- . . . . 11111'19~~~~- i :I~\_~; ~.i'i~r~ ~ -- · ,•-'!!f-·...,..·"'"~~~-·"'""'"'-· 1 ~•--r1•,••••M1 n•• •., -- ..•...,-',.._., •• ,-..,~"', 111b:, • • ~ .. 1. _. ·•. • . . "Looking at the circumstances, mi.t±-ound~g · _, this cas~· _I lm.ve. cede "itO'"take the vie,i :,. ·.... ~ " '.·. . . ·." ...,... ..,, ', ~''lb,dr·11t.'n-~ conrffltf•'l:itlitlftt•o~'tbe . i ··----•-' ... --~~ ,i,_.., ,\:,;..,;. , •, appli6ation seht1b~·1~(1) af·the Uw of · or 'Limit~t:ton ··'i~'tf''"'W!td ·-ti"'1.El altso·'1ft1'·~-~ : , <, • ~...,.( ··-.~:-"' • • . - · considered judicia.l view that this court can J.)r;~e~a. :-1;·;;· ao'~~ su.o. motu't · •••••• ••• ••• I will, and do hereby, extend the period of liilii t~ition to the day . . ;:.. ' ...,.,~ . ;" ' application was instituted in this · . I Court, · and wi~ that"•,;-l ,ove~ thf3. , - ... , ., ·--::'it..,;.,..: 0 ,..,.,.- ••• • ._ preliminary objec·tion. 11 . ,.,.. ~~~tr~~;ft•r'c'1':e~•th: ..i:::!/ j~dge ~~~~1•-..~~ ·. ~- '· he. said, had.. ac'bed . in ·oontraventio!r . .. of · th• pron.sions o•.,.··l'•" , .: - · · ~·~-~" ··•t•·-•1••·-~--••lfrl1.1•11lliat·~.k ·~--~ .·. . .. . . . - . . . '· ' . 16!1 fr. "'~ ~t . • ' • • ~ . . . . ~(~' ' ~ ., . . ~ . . .' ' - 4 - 11 3. - {1) SU.bject to the provisions of this Act, every proceeding described in the first column of the First Schedule to this Act and which is instituted after the period of limitation' prescribed the~efor·opposi.te .• . ·a. . the.t'eto . " in •the ae~on.d , . ' . " .. , ... oo1umn, sh_all. be dismissed whether or not ' I limitation ~~.aet- ., up.-,.,,._~.,.._oe~ ... 0 .• ' . . . ' ,...,:,,n.--•11•a,ftt1•1~11-~~•i9M.11UP•v"nlflllJ-_p1~.••11rir \. ) ·. . ' ' . • ' . i. . •· found tha.1 the applicaticm befort him was time barred then·he- · .· · . : , ""'~ • P\ll;x#GliUll-li11dlt11•llll fl)Ui-· ■-- .ilN1tsr•fl!C.....IIS&ta,r_,!lfll11111'u-.@Jll.lt<• .,~- ~~da I'11,Ainliru j, .Dfjif. •i i .,,illli::il•alalaft• ,r ;11•A•. Limitation Act %'eli~d on by, the le~ed jud~,. Ooimeel ./. Cottl:•t~·'that'~r,oar,:mri !\t.-tim~tri;OfHft•1 . period of lilbi-tation sua·••o1m.• •· I . -. . ~ft-· ; f ·\ •~n-..-,~.~••..;.f'C,\.!,k:\I<"~:.. ,, ,, ,;," ,• . . . . .ffil ... -~~~': . l •;:s~~--~ • .'. .. " . . .. . · ·· · - ~ · - _._,,,, 11111• ...,,,..... .,,,;, •~-, l lt-l!IIIIP A llllr' ••u •1ttdli t1t'fjU: I & H · -~..,.,.... .. ~-"fl!Ulia•• ,•,, ... · The .provisions of section ·1,4(1) above ·:cited are set out · ,.. ,;.: · ·• · •· . • ' •• -- • • • ·.~-·~-•,. ••_ •• J .~ . . . -w;,,, ..••-~-"~-::;\.\\'...~~~•-···- ,.·.~~~~ •.~4•~·,.,-1,· v ..• .. -~ ,;,.,., .• <l',4'1•,!•~·~~--..... 'f\' hereunder for e·ase of ·reference. · 1 11 14-..,.; (1)·Notwithstanding the.provisions of t}?is ·A9t, the court ma.y,' for.~ reasona.b1e or sufficient cause, extend the period .of limitation·for the ' institu.;_ .... - . tion of an appeal. or an application, ·other than an a,pp1i.•cation f'or·''ffie~~ "' · ·· · ·-· execution of a_decree, and an_application \. .,.-•~.,~,. . ,~~ . evns~•..-t.,~--•·li'ain• · before or after the expiry of the period .i,;,-' ..-~•.-i•PUb@U• • .,..~-- ..· of J.imitati~re•ori.bed-for~ • ...,.... ~-···-.i- .........ur.~~-lliti.......1Md...,.► . - . . .,, . . ... . . . ,, ,;,,-;c .;,p.., ~ ~~: --~~-·• -, which generally requires instituted after the expiration qf..the period or'. limitation. t~Ojl,-1" dismiss, "'.,;t!eedi.n/J, . , . Under this p ~ . the c<Rirt~e[.~iscret:i.on to · enlarge ·~ pe·rtod of limitation except where the matter is an applicatiqn . . . . ... . •· for the . exe.cution- of _a deore.$A , The question, .however,. -i•~~'>f,• ' ' ' •;.whether the_ p~vision ·emp9.~e.rs ·the. C~Uf5t.lo enlar8e _t1¼~ , ·.. _: -! .. ~ - - •--l~~'.--"~Jl!l!----~:•-li'. period .of ~~tation. suo--motu -or whethe · ·: '•(}QU.rt has~,~• I • • • • ..,..~-> • " •, • .; ~ , .... '. ;, : -: . • J.[)PJllll'." m • , . .N' .. ~ to ,,.lfili11Mll.••.1.. . . . . . . . . . . . . u.~bl1Plln• ·•• 2 u.t. Al •11~• ·- \I.• n,. .. ex~:-llilAti,lf 1,i ■ iJJBfl:lfflf'illllilllb,llli.f JIili . .,..~_Ad~ it. .It is hard! ·. ·necess~·- to \'·a.a.a· thai'li:~e·• , ,.· . ~s en,."?,.;.,.,.~•.:,~,: .'rt ~~·~· . . ... · . . w•..t•i! r)~•h ••· .ill• ¥t i•:IIP•.1 • ••--• JSel c I Urtf •-•-•4"' j '· t_fNII • f_T · • I' 11 •• •••:: ~ -~-~~~!~.~..!~:t.!i.$'.?f.~·-~. ~ ~ ~ v i s a g e ~.-~;-: -..... si t1~~••••£1••• •••• ~tall•lkiW19tal'I "1!111rfflf. 'mlf L"fWr'~•- < il 1 0 before'lw1i'···1s a··:ri t. ca~t1.rn'ct;::t~ i>ejct;~ the _period of-•~··• ,·- . ,_...,.;.,,.......,...,.-.-.........•""'.......,,J11._;u::111t••.. ·•. .,..,.,.. ~,,...-. ....... "'.... ,,,.,..._.,<. • ,,, · ·-:"!•I ~-•.,~ • limitation ·in order, say, to remedy an obvious injustice, that ·tff'bfe; iieff~e·re""~eS:S&bte•'~:t' •~#ic1ent grourui•"7•· 1 .~•~••.-j• extending . the period . of liDQ:ta.tion but that ' the ,pe.rty .1 concemed has not moved the Court. In such a sittiation. we· think-: that::-- it is open>to ··-the - judge tcf ·tnt~te to ,;,,t:£:e party conc.e~et'ilif;;. l)rel)ar8dn88.._..1t:.~"~&,'•,j_~"11f~~-e_~ij.,.,.fil. .,.~~IW~~-•.-, then leave 1 t for the party concerned to decide whether or ·: · · ~ .. ,. ·not ffl~~-;ll!fi81,... fM.l<U'f 1i~ori·~~-:n~th;i ··,~·Jjl. ' ' 1 • , . l \, • , •f • • • l,i ,•. the ~ . , . o o ~ • · -~~ ail · ·'_' · •---the'niat1f. - 11is . . 6 . . ' . here will avoid a possible dishannony or anomaly which can arise in1 certain cases. For instance, where the party concern.en does not share the Court's vie:w that the proceeding is time barred, such party may refuse to take the Court 1 s advice. That wili . be • the ,. , ·. end of the .·: _.__ '!'"- ·, matter ..,.~.,--.-~·.-\.·.o:-,~.(c., ""'-· -~·~ ➔ -t.•_f.,:,;•> ✓ and so far thi~ rdli be : . ,.,,,-tf·>•r~· "'-'·!t~:-.,_t i· smoothl ·However where the Court, acting on· its own iili.tiative,- ~ro~~~~~,9~~148"Stw..mw;,J>cm.c~:.~ ...~--- .. : ', . . . -~ . ~ . . -. ' . ' .. . . - ~ ... - ~- ._. _,. . . . .- ~ ' ., . .~ •. . - . ·. ~ . ·-. Odl'tftlff'111MI 1tiF•••••--. t . . . . . . . .'i}lll\tlltr■~- . .: ... timott.s1:., ....fhut('•i:'t ·wae · SOllewbett '9Jl!ltd17'Cfld.-.4ndeed.4Tellled -.tltM ••'•n ' th~~e';l:'il!J! fte . .·,.' - . ._,,,..,.;,,~.,•·«,,....:.~.~, :, \ -•·, 1 -~ 11 8' '!ffl'!fflgw•1,,1'Mf!l8!'WI ~-:,-,ty;,'1$1'.>•"'· ., -~-····•"•'•: ...')l,.•.. • ~•:,f.~~,.-:,,~-"t~• ..... app~~~-~u:;..JtG~9~Ai..&•,Alli1J~ 4'ii1Ml'-•n9~••► his Counsel that the application was timous. 1'he Court • ·.~-,.,1t'~ ,.,;.•;•llt'<"°'''•-.<·i<:,··.,.-.n•:•,f• ·.. ,.,• ..... ,;~•~~,.:l,,,111-"~l'M""-,• ,.,i,-JA,llf'~-l•lllli,IIJil•• 1r - I ~ , ; , , ~ purported to assist a party ~ho thrcn,1.gh his counsel was saying th~t he was not in ne~d :o-r 'that ·kind of assistance.. i!l:a.t'\tc!'oe's .'·· .·, ' ·.. -~. -:-· - ~lfii' not commend the Court; instead it tends disrespect. fo: to earn ' -~• \. :·.. '.,.~il .,..__,a,..,,, ... ~ ,.._,:-·\,'~:.,: ....,-~11·_:·tf:;.,;4.;_~- · • ··· ·.,-•4'.!i..!rl.;_1¼,-,,.1)·1.~:~,"Pi.--,,_;·'-l~I-,.• ~ ' 1 the Court. In short it does not accord with the ·smooth. . ' Wadf 1 1/'!Pl. . .fi'l:IIIIMllfS-tl ef¼• • . ., , : .', .. . A11~-1 ......9 Mf 1.:-..◄.liJ •·· 11JIS 1:.101011:f·fe.•tt!Jl#.• fllr- -~ 9 ,· . . / • • ·'.· '. ' . ';;..; -: . •• . •. . '.)!i,J: ' .• { • :·._. ~ : ' ·. . ' iii · . · 1 . i' opj ~jPll.~ e . ~ \';'. i o · t · f · ii . · a . / . - 7 - the opportunity of being heard. Such approach puts the court in a position where it can properly detennine whether ) . or not reasonable or sufficient cause has been disclosed for extending the time, and serves to ensure that the court• ' ., . •· , ,.... . ,: ,· _. '.' ·,-. ,,:,;•t•>:·•··- -1~,~➔-~1'.·;;, s . discretion is exercised judicially. In the instant .ca.i, ~~oJ_.i ."·. . _ . • ' ~ • ...... • • ; ,•.'9 • ' • , _i • ·,. , ·- -· '\. t . .. suclf ,,appii'c~tfb:tf'' wa~- ··mactr!n'r,~ri~~e'fore7··1 e _ · . - '' ,,; .. , . . ' . :- ..,.... ~-~""" . ..:lfj,. . . ~;~-'fo'A>,~itt--•• . . . . . . . . ., ....... ,.,.. . . '..- -- . ! •• _;,- ·-··; , . &-··· ....,..._.~i'. his . ·client ~---------~ resided .... abroad- and therefore iri --------lilli.;~.;......... ' •. } tenn.s 'of secti n:;. -:· -· , ..... -- ;.~~--~~=-~~;.Ui'.'~~::N.;t.;t~.,~tis~ial;c:e,:;;·;. . not begin to. -run against him until he came ~•-~:..,he:.:<~•fiiiii!•iltt•••"' . . ,, . r ., . . ·• ., , . .·. , . . - '.,.. ' come back at . a11 ~- . .Agaih ··tmmse1.' .stri:fr1uousiy 11·~1Mt'!l!711Rf'. ,,~•*w--- this appJ.ication was .in i;he nature of a su.i1i-~•·::~c~.,.,...~~f. of an interest in land, so_; tha .the period 1 :f ,.~~~~:.~~~'1f~~. 4 l. ,', _. 12 years prescribed under Item 24 of ~art I of\ :j;~~. F~~~o/.';"· :1 • ' Schedule to the Law of Limitation A~t had no:t~~"~~~\11••~· : at the time of filing this application. All- ,ihlise . -.. ·:. '• ~~- · . , , .. ," .. ~.,,, ...... ",',""Nlt_r..~.--,..... ,--J,"-..... ~ , , ~ . . ·. t- '· •' . '.•- . . .. tyu ,~-~ mQ-•11• if!f.4_, w .......... •• ifilM ·---- ·.. were, no doubt, interesting. But it_ is quite. apparent. that ,.. ; . . . . . ,r: ~¢F _- . /,•; .~:•¥{'::-·:..":'li,t>,.--,:.'p,!t._ '. t .....~,,,: .-~~~,'" :JiP.f3l'.~. «4g,.~..2i~~F.~1ilt.~~~M•Ol1•:-'IUIF'-tlutlllilllfllllllltJt\lBf 'I, • • ,·· • . · , .. : .. !-~-· t_,. ·,•· ':.1;. :~_:· · The High Court juq.ge made specific fin · .. ,, ·; .. ~ . ~ ..-1--J;..-·· · · •.·.,i .. ,, .• • · ·. · ~~~·'I" ~... d ~~,~~~-'••-•~:.:)" •~ 'N'. 1, . '-1'••••~ft:>•~~i~i•"~~:. ~~;·.~ e,~ . . • • ~ ~• ~C- • • · • ~ ..... -:. : . · .. ' ,. ·• ·-. , ' ~ I • ' .... : ,.,:J~,~i1••t1.,•~ .,-~- 8 of appeal is that once the judge found that the application was time barred he had to dismiss it and he could not extend the period of limitation suo motu as he did. To our minds it seems plain that that question cannot be answered by . seeking to establish that the application was not time ....,,..,..__ •~•/ ..... 'f.•'f,; f;,•-i '\, , • -. . ♦-~• . . . . ., ...... • ~~ ,.· •.J I•"""'""'• ~"f' .,:.., '1•"'~·-4., _:+-1,• 1 • ba.rr~d• Such argument was, with·due respect, irr~leva.nt.. _ ·: ~,\>J·'t7.¥ Dr~-: :tainwai: 'sh~~Id (have ···ooncent~:ted on ;seeking ,to·· ~~fuo~t~te~{~- ~·; '• . i~i1.: .... _, •.•~·>\>- .. - . : ·.;i-•.·. •• .,~,.-,': ,;,_,; ::;.• :_ '.'?-'..~:..f··~;'ll"'~-. ,~,---::;~~11;-~:,.:\~:.f•~-- , ri er. f · · __the 1 c tion. efo .. - · l , .· . _.' .~.-.. -him· to_. be- tiui;; ·birred, 'haci' tlie :~~wer "t6" extend•; hi:t•~·r:foo?·:··"Y!''v~- ·:~; -;~'" ~------h-,--~--~lj___JlltNMI,,...:ea.mW~·"' 1 ~~w~~l~lt-:m~ci=~A~~--•--W~-~ we a.re··o:r tlie se ll'tled "VJ.8W. 111ia-f 1111e·· 1.~4f7ttfW,rettttt~. 1 1 ~~- . . ere.u4ix,,1.0re • •. .. .. 0 .. • t ~ ' ' ·=" t 4'- ~,o,-;•-. -:! • f. < •. ,;.:st\. • • '• ' • • • "' • " • .- • ' o • .~ I ' • •" ;" I • 111~ "414ittnot·•1baYej8\ichsRODri1awl-athat.,"lh8__1su.bmi-ttaAitbY~I-. .~"' . ~ ~ a , • -"'t.41f'6tr~.MCAuiUm.:MWJ&4JJlJ..«M;.;t~ ~ . , . ~'~~~•~~?l••·~~fl~~a.~~~!-t,~-~;,~~~.~"1'~e~~~~~J;~~~g~, .~e':-t~on 3(!) o,t .the_ L~'! of '.L~.~~~i~I: -~c~_,__ 1~c~J!~;~~r~p!~~~'._."~- . :_: .. •""-)"' ,-4 --i -,.zwfl\l.1·w.r~do;~..-11t-~"':j..,.,p...~1ir•••••mi.-~•!i!J.,;~-~~~~~~~~ ' • J , • • ,.:~./..·.- ,.,J-. • ';• •. . In ."U}lEtresult'··we aocordirigiy .allow· 'the·:,ippeaJ.:;· Wl. tl•(t·~A,.;:<-.l.;., ·~~- ..,.~.i.::M1'-l.•-t:r;,,- ~·· " ..... : .. .... --1.... "'"'· ·;',......-.t ~~~:.I,(~'- , • ~- "'."····· .. ~ ..4t-~t.:• .... "· •·'-9.,,~~·•~wt'+.\~~...--,.~.~1.-~r.tt~~~~~~,."'!,,4.... ,~~ costs& · · f· . ··r-~:~-..._..i ~··--... ,- .J,."V..: -~~~---::..... :.- , .. ,P"t~\f:'., • • -·~- ♦ .-.,..(: • ,. ' - - . . , ~ ~ " ( ~ . ; ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .{ ~ . ·-.o.~ . .~-te. . . ~~,..~,.-...!rJ.,;,, ... ~ DATED at DAR ES SALAAM . ' . this 21st day of November, 1995 • ::~·:!_-. . \ .·.,.\ . . . ·>;; : -~-<1 . ,R. H. KISANGA .. . ,, . ·~~ ... .~- J. .:.-JUSTICE OF APP~-~-:.. ~-. ,:t• . , ~ _,.• .,} -"' ·• ._:. •••~ .. { . . ' . ' ~-~•~~~,... •• _ • q . is'. ;,"'\t~_..;.:#c'.'> .. ~ ;•:~."'.~,~-=•.✓ .... ··~~T~ci - · ~ ~ ~ t W 1 ' ! ~ - i,,.,!~'.>,~~\1.- $tkJ~•tl~,- · '-.~. ,, . . ... ' ,. ; ""' .;~~i111t~;~--~L•·,,tM•1f,MF~~)~~'~"t>fiii},:.~".'i~•t::;-, · . . · . . '- JUSTICE OF. APPEAL· · ." :-- 1 • •• -.""c1~ ~-~·· · --~ · - ·.- .. • • ~ - - - - - - - - - ... " ,t