N

The prosecution failed to conclusively establish the maximum legal price for rice at Urambo; therefore, the conviction cannot stand.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: N
Parties: Appellant: Abedi s/d Sindahabanga; Respondent: Republic
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 1 January 1973
Procedural Posture: Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome: appeal allowed
Legal Topics: Price Control, Maximum Price Violation
Source Language: english

Criminal Law Regulatory Law Price Control Maximum Price Violation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Abedi s/d Sindahabanga

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the prosecution proved the maximum legal price for rice at Urambo
2 Whether the conviction for selling above maximum price was valid

Ratio Decidendi

The prosecution failed to conclusively establish the maximum legal price for rice at Urambo; therefore, the conviction cannot stand.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

conviction quashed
sentence set aside

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.

N