abilahi omari vs mwanate ally 2007 tzhc 95 29 may 2007

abilahi omari vs mwanate ally 2007 tzhc 95 29 may 2007

The appeal was dismissed because the evidence from multiple prosecution witnesses sufficiently established the appellant's guilt for house breaking and stealing, and there was no sufficient ground of complaint in the appeal.

Citation
abilahi omari vs mwanate ally 2007 tzhc 95 29 may 2007
Parties
Appellant: Abilahi Omari; Respondent: Mwanate Ally
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
29 May 2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Summary Rejection at High Court
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
House Breaking, Stealing, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
English
Criminal Law House Breaking Stealing Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Abilahi Omari

Appellant

Mwanate Ally

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Summary Rejection at High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conviction for house breaking and stealing was supported by sufficient evidence
  2. 2 Whether the sentence and compensation order were justified

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the evidence from multiple prosecution witnesses sufficiently established the appellant's guilt for house breaking and stealing, and there was no sufficient ground of complaint in the appeal.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • appeal dismissed in its entirety