abraham abraham simama vs bahati sanga otherrs 2021 tzca 114 14 april 2021

abraham abraham simama vs bahati sanga otherrs 2021 tzca 114 14 april 2021

The applicant was blameless for the delay, which was caused by manifest errors in the certificate of delay regarding the notification date for collection of proceedings; thus, good cause was shown for extension of time.

Citation
abraham abraham simama vs bahati sanga otherrs 2021 tzca 114 14 april 2021
Parties
Applicant: Abraham Abraham Simama; First Respondent: Bahati Sanga; Second Respondent: Nixon Mwakibete; Third Respondent: Nolic Co. Limited & Court Broker
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
14 April 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to Institute Appeal
Outcome
application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals, Certificate of Delay, Computation of Limitation Period
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Abraham Abraham Simama

Applicant

Bahati Sanga

First Respondent

Nixon Mwakibete

Second Respondent

Nolic Co. Limited & Court Broker

Third Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to Institute Appeal

  1. 1 Whether there is good cause to grant extension of time to file an appeal due to errors in the certificate of delay

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant was blameless for the delay, which was caused by manifest errors in the certificate of delay regarding the notification date for collection of proceedings; thus, good cause was shown for extension of time.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • Applicant granted sixty days from the date of delivery of the ruling to lodge the Memorandum and Record of Appeal.
  • Costs shall be in the cause.