abraham gaya vs peter buchiru 2017 tzhc 2120 21 april 2017
The Ward Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to award and quantify costs, and the District Land and Housing Tribunal's execution order based on such award was a nullity; both orders were quashed and set aside.
- Citation
- abraham gaya vs peter buchiru 2017 tzhc 2120 21 april 2017
- Parties
- Appellant: Abrahaman Gaya; Respondent: Pawa Buchiru
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 21 April 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Land Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Costs Taxation, Jurisdiction of Tribunals, Execution of Costs Orders
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Abrahaman Gaya
Appellant
Pawa Buchiru
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Ward Tribunal had jurisdiction to award and quantify costs
- 2 Whether the execution of costs order by the District Land and Housing Tribunal was valid
Ratio Decidendi
The Ward Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to award and quantify costs, and the District Land and Housing Tribunal's execution order based on such award was a nullity; both orders were quashed and set aside.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- The order of the Bahi Ward Tribunal for payment of THz 678,000 as costs is quashed and set aside.
- The execution order of the District Land and Housing Tribunal of Dodoma is quashed and set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment