abubakar ali himid vs edward nyelusye 2017 tzca 139 28 july 2017
The appeal was struck out because the record of appeal was incomplete and improperly constituted, contravening Rules 96(1) and (4) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009. The Court held that neither Rule 2 nor Article 107A(2)(e) could be invoked to cure such fundamental defects, and procedural rules must be observed for the proper administration of justice.
- Citation
- abubakar ali himid vs edward nyelusye 2017 tzca 139 28 july 2017
- Parties
- Appellant: Abubakar Ali Himid; Respondent: Edward Nyelusye
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Competence of Record of Appeal and Related Applications
- Outcome
- appeal and applications struck out
- Legal Topics
- Record of Appeal, Procedural Compliance, Amendment of Appeal Record, Striking Out Incompetent Appeals
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abubakar Ali Himid
Appellant
Edward Nyelusye
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Competence of Record of Appeal and Related Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the record of appeal is competent under the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009
- 2 Whether the Court should allow amendment of the record of appeal or use the original record to hear the appeal
- 3 Whether procedural rules can be relaxed under Rule 2 and Article 107A(2)(e) to save the appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was struck out because the record of appeal was incomplete and improperly constituted, contravening Rules 96(1) and (4) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009. The Court held that neither Rule 2 nor Article 107A(2)(e) could be invoked to cure such fundamental defects, and procedural rules must be observed for the proper administration of justice.
Court Disposition
appeal and applications struck out
Orders
- The record of appeal is struck out for incompetence.
- Civil Application No. 196 of 2013 and Civil Application No. 240 of 2013 are struck out as they have no basis after the appeal is struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment