19700508 TZHC Dar es salaam
The evidence was insufficient for conviction on count 10, so the appeal on that count is allowed. The evidence on counts 11 to 20 was clear, so the appeal on those counts is dismissed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19700508 TZHC Dar es salaam
- Parties
- Appellant: Abuj Sff0afi; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 8 May 1970
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- partly allowed and partly dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appeal, Forgery, Offences by Servant, Conviction, Sentence
- Source Language
- english
Criminal Law Appeal Forgery Offences by Servant Conviction Sentence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
Abuj Sff0afi
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction on count 10 was supported by sufficient evidence
- 2 Whether the convictions on counts 11 to 20 were justified
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence was insufficient for conviction on count 10, so the appeal on that count is allowed. The evidence on counts 11 to 20 was clear, so the appeal on those counts is dismissed.
Court Disposition
partly allowed and partly dismissed
Orders
- Conviction on count 10 quashed and appeal allowed on that count
- Appeal on counts 11 to 20 dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment