ace audit control expertise t vs cek company ltd 2007 tzhc 46 20 april 2007

The respondent's preliminary objection against the application for revision is struck out due to failure to argue it as ordered by the court, having instead filed submissions on an irrelevant objection.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: ace audit control expertise t vs cek company ltd 2007 tzhc 46 20 april 2007
Parties: Applicant: ACE - Audit Control Expertise (T); Respondent: CEK Company Ltd
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 20 April 2007
Procedural Posture: Civil Revision / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome: Preliminary objection struck out with costs
Legal Topics: Stay of Execution, Preliminary Objection, Revision Proceedings
Source Language: english

Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Preliminary Objection Revision Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

ACE - Audit Control Expertise (T)

Applicant

CEK Company Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Revision / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent's preliminary objection against the application for revision should be entertained given failure to file proper submissions

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Preliminary objection struck out with costs

Orders

Application for revision to be heard on 20/8/2007

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.