ace audit control expertise vs cek company ltd 2007 tzhc 211 21 december 2007
The decision of the trial court refusing extension of time is appealable, and therefore the application for revision is misconceived and without merit.
- Citation
- ace audit control expertise vs cek company ltd 2007 tzhc 211 21 december 2007
- Parties
- Applicant: ACE - Audit Control Expertise (T); Respondent: CEK Company Ltd
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Revision, Jurisdiction, Extension of Time, Appealability
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
ACE - Audit Control Expertise (T)
Applicant
CEK Company Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial court had jurisdiction to determine Civil Case No. 55 of 2003
- 2 Whether the decision refusing extension of time was appealable or revisable
Ratio Decidendi
The decision of the trial court refusing extension of time is appealable, and therefore the application for revision is misconceived and without merit.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- Application dismissed
- Applicant to pay costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment