yusufu vs republic 2005 tzhc 3 12 january 2005
The appellant knowingly made false representations regarding ownership of the house, received the rent money as a consequence of those representations, and acted with common intention to defraud. The prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt. The sentence imposed was within the statutory limit and not excessive.
- Citation
- yusufu vs republic 2005 tzhc 3 12 january 2005
- Parties
- Appellant: Adam slo Yusufu; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 12 January 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- False Pretences, Obtaining Money by False Pretences, Sentencing, Standard of Proof, Common Intention
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Adam slo Yusufu
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant obtained money by false pretences under Section 302 of the Penal Code
- 2 Whether the conviction was supported by evidence beyond reasonable doubt
- 3 Whether the sentence imposed was excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant knowingly made false representations regarding ownership of the house, received the rent money as a consequence of those representations, and acted with common intention to defraud. The prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt. The sentence imposed was within the statutory limit and not excessive.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Conviction and sentence of 4 years imprisonment upheld
- Order to pay Tz. Shs. 960,000 as compensation to the complainant affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment