20111216 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Citation
- 20111216 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 16 December 2011
- Posture
- Probate and Administration Cause / Ruling on Application for Directions by Administrator General
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 16 December 2011
- Posture
- Probate and Administration Cause / Ruling on Application for Directions by Administrator General
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
All children of the deceased, irrespective of the marital status of their mothers or the legitimacy of their birth, are entitled to inherit the deceased's estate equally. The house at Magomeni should be sold and the proceeds distributed equally among all children and the two widows who contributed to its acquisition.
Court disposition
Application for directions granted. Directions issued.
Orders
- The house at Plot No. 152 Block 'R' Magomeni shall be sold at market value.
- Proceeds of sale to be distributed equally among all children and the two widows, Theresia Mganga and Joyce Beatrice Ruhui.
- Sale to be completed within three months from the date of ruling.
- Any rent collected to date to be distributed among the deceased's children within one month.
02
Material facts
Parties
Administrator General
Applicant Counsel: Mr. MhozyaTheresia Mganga
Interested PartyJoyce Beatrice Ruhui
Interested PartyCatherine David Mganga
BeneficiaryAngela David Mganga
BeneficiaryBlandina David Mganga
BeneficiaryDavis David Mganga
BeneficiaryAndrew David Mganga
BeneficiaryThomas David Mganga
BeneficiaryManley David Mganga
BeneficiaryMaryline David Mganga
BeneficiaryMaud David Mganga
BeneficiaryRobert David Mganga
BeneficiaryBahati David Mganga
BeneficiaryAmounts and remedies
- Monthly Rent for House: TZS 150,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Probate and Administration Cause / Ruling on Application for Directions by Administrator General
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Who are the legal heirs to the estate of the late David Vincent Mganga?
- 02
How should the house at Plot No. 152 Block 'R' Magomeni be dealt with and its proceeds distributed?
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The Administrator General sought directions from the court on the identification of legal heirs and the manner of distribution of the deceased's estate, specifically the house at Magomeni.
- Respondent
- Theresia Mganga argued only her children (born of a Christian monogamous marriage) should inherit, excluding children from other women as illegitimate. Joyce Beatrice Ruhui argued her children (born of a civil marriage) are also entitled. Other children argued all should inherit as they are all the deceased's children.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Court's interpretation of customary law and succession principles
All children of the deceased, regardless of the marital status of their mothers or legitimacy, are entitled to inherit under African customary law and Tanzanian succession law.
- 02
Court's reasoning based on facts and lack of prior partition
Contributions by spouses towards acquisition of matrimonial property do not entitle them to exclusive inheritance rights unless specifically partitioned at divorce.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
All children of the deceased, irrespective of the marital status of their mothers or the legitimacy of their birth, are entitled to inherit the deceased's estate equally. The house at Magomeni should be sold and the proceeds distributed equally among all children and the two widows who contributed to its acquisition.
Obiter and limits
- Arguments based on legitimacy and exclusivity of inheritance by children of monogamous marriage are contrary to African customs and have no place in Tanzanian succession law.
- Contributions by spouses to acquisition of property were intended to assist the deceased and do not create exclusive inheritance rights.
Court disposition
Application for directions granted. Directions issued.
- The house at Plot No. 152 Block 'R' Magomeni shall be sold at market value.
- Proceeds of sale to be distributed equally among all children and the two widows, Theresia Mganga and Joyce Beatrice Ruhui.
- Sale to be completed within three months from the date of ruling.
- Any rent collected to date to be distributed among the deceased's children within one month.
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 16 December 2011
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 16 December 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) AT DAR ES SALAAM. PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION CAUSE NO.65 OF 1991. IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE-DAVID VICENT MGANGA -
AND
IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION BY THE ADMINISTRATOR GENERAL FOR DIRECTIONS. Date of last order 25/10/2011. Date of Ruling 16/12/2011. RULING. ' . / ' ' ( A.F. Shangwa, J. On 29 th July, 1992, this court granted letters of Administration of the property and credits of the late David Vincent Mganga to the Admin1.strator General. The late_ David Vincent Mganga hereinafter to be referred to as the deceased died at Muhimbili Hospital Dar es Salaam on, 3 rd 1 July, 1985. He died intestate. He was survived with the following children:- [ 1]. Catherine David Mganga@ Change. [2]. Angela David Mganga@ Kigenda. [3]. Blandina David Mganga@ Mariam. · [4]. Davis David Mganga@ Kipao. [5]. Andrew David Mganga@ Mdoe. [6]. Thomas David Mganga @ Samweli. [7]. Manley David @ Shehiza Mganga. [8].. Maryline David Mganga. [9]. Maud David Mganga. [10].Robert David Mganga. [ 11]. Bahati David Mganga. 2 The above mentioned Children belong to different mothers namely Theresia Mganga, Joyce Beatrice Ruhui, Tekero Mwashunda, Mary_M_b~, M~ Hiza and Tatu Chogelo. The Children who belong to Theresia Mganga are as follows:- - - - - - - - - - - _(-L) - _M_ary lip.~_ IY!g~g~ (2) · Maud Mganga (3.)-: Robert Mganga (4) Bahati Mganga The children who belong to Joyce Beatrice Ruhui are as follows:- ( 1) David Mganga (2) Antj.rew Mganga (3) Kigenda Mganga 3 The rest of the Children belong to different mothers as herein
below:- Blandina Mganga's mother 1s Tekero Mwashunda. - - - Catherine Mganga's mother lS Mary Mbai. . Samweii . Thomas's mother is Mary Hiza. Manley Shehiza's mother is Tatu Chongela. ~~_p_art from those Children, the deceased left behind one house at plot No. 152 Block "R" Magomeni , Minaki Street , Kinondoni District , Dar es Salaam. This house is presently being rented by one Rogers Sezinga at a sum of Tshs 150,000/= per month. The rent from this house 1s paid to the Administrator General for purposes of administration to the deceased's beneficiaries /heirs. The prevailing facts in this pro bate and administration cause are as follows:- 4 Theresia Mganga and Joyce Beatrice Ruhui Mganga were the wives of the deceased. At the time of his death, the deceased had divorced them many years ago. - He was living with one Tatu Mary Mpembwa with whom he had no . children. Theresia Mganga was his ·first._ wife. He contracted a Christian Marriage with her on 31 st __ ~uly, 1966 at Vuga Lutheran church. After living with her -- - -· - - for several years, he divorced her .and contracted a Civil marriage with Joyce Beatrice Ruhui at Ilala Barna. He also lived with her for several years, went with her to the United States of America for further studies and when they came back to Tanzania, he divorced her. After divorcing her, he contracted a customary marriage with Tatu Mary Mpembwa with
whom he lived until his death. The deceased had several other women as earlier demonstrated. At present, Theresia Mganga, Joyce Beatrice Ruhui, their children and the children who were brought forth by 5 different mothers are .fighting for .inheritance of the house at plot. No. 152 Block 'R' Minaki Street, Magomeni area, Kinondoni District, Dar es Salaam. They are also fighting - -· - for. the rentals of .the -said house. -Ei1ch child· is demanding for a share. All of them are quarreling over the inheritance of the . said house. They are at 'logger-heads and are threatening to bewitch and kill each other I tell you!. - On 4 th May, 2007, the Ad!Ilinistrator general who was appointed as administrator of the deceased's estate filed a Chamber application for directions on how the· house in ,issue should be dealt with· . and to direct him as to who are ~ .. _ the legal heirs/beneficiaries to the deceased's estate. The application was brought under S. 30 of the Administrator General's Act [Cap. 27 R.E. 2002]. During the hearing of this application, the learned State Attorney, Mr. Muhozya told this Court that there is a big dispute among the deceased's children and two X- 6 widows of the deceased namely Theresia David Mganga and Joyce Beatrice Ruhui over the inheritance of the house at plot No. 152 Block 'R' Magomeni, Minaki Street, Kinondoni - - - - - -- - - - _ District , J?ar
es Salaam Region. He said · that Theresia - Mganga is contending that as her marriage was a Christian Monoganous marriage, the only children who_ are legally supposed to inherit the said house are her children alone Ruhui's children and other children who were born out of wedlock are not supposed to inherit it on ground of illegitimacy. It appears to me that Theresia Mganga is being opposed by Joyce Beatrice Ruhui who is contending that her children are also supposed to inherit the deceased's property as she contracted a Civil marriage with him and that like Theresia Mganga's children her children were also born within wedlock and are legally entitled to inherit the deceased's property. It appears to me also that Theresia 7 Mganga is also being opposed by Joyce Ruhui's children and other children who were fathered by the deceased with other women. These children are contending that being the deceased's children, they are legally- entitled to inherit his - property namely the ~.ouse.at Magomeni. They are saying that they will create havoc if they will be denied a share in '\._ . that house. ---- Under these circumstances, it is quite obvious that the Administrator General who is administering the deceased's state was quite justified in seeking for directions of this .court on: how the hquse at Magomeni should be dealt with and to direct him as to who are the legal beneficiaries
or heirs to the deceased's estate. In my view, the deceased was a great lover of women and children. In his life time, he dealt with several women. These were seven in number. As a result, he got eleven children. All of these children used to call him 'Baba'. The 8 AdmirJ.istrator General's request is to direct him as to who ... are the legal heirs to the deceased's estate. In my opinion, the legal heirs to the deceased's estate are those children who used to call him 'Baba'. They all deserve a share in the deceased's property at Magomeni without exception. The argument by Theresia Mganga that as she ·--------------~contracted _ a __ 91:)tistian Monogamous marriage with the deceased, the children who are supposed to inherit his property are her children alone as they are the only ones who were born within wedlock is an abuse of her own customs and African traditional cultures in which the question of illegitimacy of children is of no moment and has no place. Also, her argument that her children are the only ones who are supposed to inherit the house at Magomeni because she contributed some of her salaries in purchasing it from National Housing Corporation is not valid. Similarly, Joyce Beatrice Ruhui's argument that her children deserve a share 1n the house at Magomeni 9 .. because she contributed her marriage gratuity for payment of the loan in respect of the said house is not
valid. I say their argument is not valid because their contributions were intended to assist their late husband (deceased)· in acquiring it. That is why when he divorced them, none of them petitioned for its division between him and her. --The -Administrator _Q-~µ<;_r_~l requested this Court also to direct him on how the deceased's estate namely the house in issue should be dealt with. In my considered opinion, as the children of the deceased's X- widows and the rest of the Children who were fathered by the deceased with other women are threatening to bewitch and kill each other and are quarreling over the inheritance of the house in issue, I direct that it should be sold and the proceeds of sale should be distributed equally among the deceased's children without exception. 10 For the sake· of fairness, the deceased's x- widows namely Theresia Mganga and Joyce Beatrice Ruhui who made contributions to the deceased for payment of the -- - - - Loan -to National Housing Corporation in acquiring- it should as well get equal shares with the deceased's children after selling it. I strongly direct that the Administrator General should sell it at the market value and the proceeds of sale should accordingly be dfsErioulea.______ _ as directed herein. This task of selling it should be accomplished within a p~~t()d of three months from today. . . . If there is any rent which has so far been collected, it should be distributed by the Administrator General to the deceased's children only within a period of one month from A.F. Shangwa,
JUDGE 16/12/2011. 11 I'· Delivered in open Court this 16 th day of December, 2011 in· the presence of Mr. Mhozya for the Administrator General and all interested parties.
JUDGE 16/12/2011. 12
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.