MALATA NO 2 compressed 1
Objections on relevance and authenticity of certificate of seizure are not grounds for rejecting admissibility at this stage; prior ruling on relevance binds parties and bars re-raising similar objections; authenticity and content issues are reserved for final determination; certificate of seizure is admitted as exhibit.
- Citation
- MALATA NO 2 compressed 1
- Parties
- Prosecution: Republic; Accused: Iaffari Mdoe @ Abuu Kishiki; Accused: Sadick Shaban @ Mdoe @ White; Accused: Ibrahim Abdallah Ibrahim @ Masufuria; Accused: Said Hamis Mtulya @ Al Kataimi; Accused: Ally Ayoub Ngingo @ Manfudu; Accused: Said Wazir Nkuro @ Abuu Walda; Accused: Umma Ally @ Hassan @ Makata; Accused: Shomaru Said Ngwabi; Accused: Khatibu Hassan Hamisi; Accused: Issa Hassan Jabir; Accused: Nurdin Said Mhagama; Accused: Hamad Omary Hamis Luma; Accused: Ahmad Yusufu Ndulele; Accused: Hamis Hussein Ramadhani; Accused: Hamis Mirali Hussein; Accused: Ally Luma Ngachoka @ Ally; Accused: Abdallah Hamis Mohamed Lupindo @ Mzee; Accused: Abdubillah Ismail Ndibalema; Accused: Shaibu Sam Mkungu; Accused: Seif Ramadhan Seif Mbwate; Accused: Hassan Abdallah @ Madinki; Accused: Abdurashid Said Sadick; Accused: Paul Abubakar Mgita @ Abuu Osama; Accused: Abdallah Fakihi Mohamed; Accused: Abass Ayub Mkanda; Accused: Nassoro Said Hemed; Accused: Rajabu Seleman Chijeja; Accused: Mohamed Ally Omari; Accused: Said Mwinchande Mandanda; Accused: Shafii Shaibu Mputeni @ Abuu @ Abuu Tariq; Accused: Twalha Ahmad Mwaluka
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Ruling on Evidentiary Objection
- Outcome
- objections overruled; certificate of seizure admitted as exhibit
- Legal Topics
- Admissibility of Evidence, Relevance, Authenticity, Terrorism Offences
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Prosecution
Iaffari Mdoe @ Abuu Kishiki
Accused
Sadick Shaban @ Mdoe @ White
Accused
Ibrahim Abdallah Ibrahim @ Masufuria
Accused
Said Hamis Mtulya @ Al Kataimi
Accused
Ally Ayoub Ngingo @ Manfudu
Accused
Said Wazir Nkuro @ Abuu Walda
Accused
Umma Ally @ Hassan @ Makata
Accused
Shomaru Said Ngwabi
Accused
Khatibu Hassan Hamisi
Accused
Issa Hassan Jabir
Accused
Nurdin Said Mhagama
Accused
Hamad Omary Hamis Luma
Accused
Ahmad Yusufu Ndulele
Accused
Hamis Hussein Ramadhani
Accused
Hamis Mirali Hussein
Accused
Ally Luma Ngachoka @ Ally
Accused
Abdallah Hamis Mohamed Lupindo @ Mzee
Accused
Abdubillah Ismail Ndibalema
Accused
Shaibu Sam Mkungu
Accused
Seif Ramadhan Seif Mbwate
Accused
Hassan Abdallah @ Madinki
Accused
Abdurashid Said Sadick
Accused
Paul Abubakar Mgita @ Abuu Osama
Accused
Abdallah Fakihi Mohamed
Accused
Abass Ayub Mkanda
Accused
Nassoro Said Hemed
Accused
Rajabu Seleman Chijeja
Accused
Mohamed Ally Omari
Accused
Said Mwinchande Mandanda
Accused
Shafii Shaibu Mputeni @ Abuu @ Abuu Tariq
Accused
Twalha Ahmad Mwaluka
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Ruling on Evidentiary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether certificate of seizure is admissible given objections on authenticity, signature, and relevance
- 2 Whether prior ruling on relevance bars re-raising similar objections
- 3 Whether contents and authenticity objections can be determined at admission stage
Ratio Decidendi
Objections on relevance and authenticity of certificate of seizure are not grounds for rejecting admissibility at this stage; prior ruling on relevance binds parties and bars re-raising similar objections; authenticity and content issues are reserved for final determination; certificate of seizure is admitted as exhibit.
Court Disposition
objections overruled; certificate of seizure admitted as exhibit
Orders
- Certificate of seizure for items retrieved from Mohamed Ally Omari admitted as exhibit
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment