aron ulaya vs damian ulaya 1996 tzhc 29 23 april 1996
The application for extension of time must fail because the substantive appeal was filed in the wrong court, rendering it incompetent in law even if extension and review were allowed.
- Citation
- aron ulaya vs damian ulaya 1996 tzhc 29 23 april 1996
- Parties
- Applicant: Aeon Ulaya; Respondent: Dakeani Ulata
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Misc. Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Review, Jurisdiction, Appeals From Subordinate Courts
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
Aeon Ulaya
Applicant
Dakeani Ulata
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Misc. Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether extension of time to file an application for review should be granted when the original appeal was filed in the wrong court
Ratio Decidendi
The application for extension of time must fail because the substantive appeal was filed in the wrong court, rendering it incompetent in law even if extension and review were allowed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Each party to bear their own costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment