20130610 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The affidavit sworn by Jacquiline Mosha is defective for failing to comply with Section 10 of the Oaths (Judicial Proceedings) and Statutory Declarations Act No. 59 of 1966, as it does not state whether the Commissioner for Oaths knew the deponent personally or was introduced by someone known to the Commissioner.
- Citation
- 20130610 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Applicant/plaintiff: Silverstone Properties Co. Limited; 1st Respondent/1st Defendant: Dar es Salaam City Council; 1st Respondent/1st Defendant: Kinondoni Municipal Council
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Land Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- preliminary objection upheld
- Legal Topics
- Affidavit Defects, Preliminary Objection, Oaths and Statutory Declarations
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Silverstone Properties Co. Limited
Applicant/plaintiff
Dar es Salaam City Council
1st Respondent/1st Defendant
Kinondoni Municipal Council
1st Respondent/1st Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the affidavit sworn by Jacquiline Mosha is defective for failing to comply with Section 10 of the Oaths (Judicial Proceedings) and Statutory Declarations Act No. 59 of 1966
Ratio Decidendi
The affidavit sworn by Jacquiline Mosha is defective for failing to comply with Section 10 of the Oaths (Judicial Proceedings) and Statutory Declarations Act No. 59 of 1966, as it does not state whether the Commissioner for Oaths knew the deponent personally or was introduced by someone known to the Commissioner.
Court Disposition
preliminary objection upheld
Orders
- affidavit of Jacquiline Mosha struck out and expunged from court records
- costs awarded to applicant/plaintiff
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment