africa flight services limited vs the regisrtar of companies another 2022 tzhccomd 122 11 may 2022
Since the respondents do not contest the application, and there is no objection, leave is granted as sought.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- africa flight services limited vs the regisrtar of companies another 2022 tzhccomd 122 11 may 2022
- Parties
- Applicant: Africa Flight Services Limited; 1st Respondent: The Registrar of Companies; 2nd Respondent/necessary Party: The Honourable Attorney General
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Commercial Cause / Ruling on Application for Leave to Apply for Certiorari and Mandamus
- Outcome
- Leave granted
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Certiorari, Mandamus, Leave to Apply
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Africa Flight Services Limited
Applicant
The Registrar of Companies
1st Respondent
The Honourable Attorney General
2nd Respondent/necessary Party
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Commercial Cause / Ruling on Application for Leave to Apply for Certiorari and Mandamus
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to apply for orders of certiorari and mandamus
Ratio Decidendi
Since the respondents do not contest the application, and there is no objection, leave is granted as sought.
Court Disposition
Leave granted
Orders
- Leave is hereby granted to the applicant to apply for orders of certiorari and mandamus.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) AT DAR-ES-SALAAM MISC, COMMERCIAL CAUSE NO.64 OF 2021 IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPLY FOR ORDERS OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS, (CAP.212 R.E 200'2) V AFRICA FLIGHT SERVICE^LIMi®D.......APPLICANT f VERSUS^ THE REGISTRAR OBCOMPANIES...1ST RESPONDENT THE HONpU^ABt^ATTORNEY GENERA<;<.Jr RE|yONDENT/NECESSARY PARTY Date Of the Last order: 21Y04/2O22 Delivery of the Ruling: 11 /05/2022 RULING NANGELA, J.,: Following submissions by Ms. Jacquiline Kinyasi, learned State Attorney representing the 1st and 2nd Respondents, which was to the effect that the two respective Page 1 of2 respondents are not interested in contesting this application, the application should be granted. This Court, therefore, settles for the following orders: 1. That, leave is hereby granted Page 2 of2