afrisian ginning limited vs mabruki samli rajabu 2015 tzhccomd 2094 10 september 2015

afrisian ginning limited vs mabruki samli rajabu 2015 tzhccomd 2094 10 september 2015

The plaint was not in compliance with mandatory formatting requirements under Rule 19(1); amendment cannot be allowed once a preliminary objection is raised; suit must be struck out.

Citation
afrisian ginning limited vs mabruki samli rajabu 2015 tzhccomd 2094 10 september 2015
Parties
Plaintiff: Afrisian Ginning Limited; Defendant: Mabruki Samli Rajabu
Court
TZHCCOMD
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
10 September 2015
Procedural Posture
Commercial Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
suit struck out with costs
Legal Topics
Pleadings Formatting, Preliminary Objection, Amendment of Pleadings
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Afrisian Ginning Limited

Plaintiff

Mabruki Samli Rajabu

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the plaint's formatting contravenes Rule 19(1) of the High Court (Commercial Division) Procedure Rules, 2012
  2. 2 Whether amendment of the plaint is permissible after a preliminary objection is raised

Ratio Decidendi

The plaint was not in compliance with mandatory formatting requirements under Rule 19(1); amendment cannot be allowed once a preliminary objection is raised; suit must be struck out.

Court Disposition

suit struck out with costs

Orders

  • Suit struck out with costs