afrisian ginning limited vs mabruki samli rajabu 2015 tzhccomd 2094 10 september 2015
The plaint was not in compliance with mandatory formatting requirements under Rule 19(1); amendment cannot be allowed once a preliminary objection is raised; suit must be struck out.
- Citation
- afrisian ginning limited vs mabruki samli rajabu 2015 tzhccomd 2094 10 september 2015
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Afrisian Ginning Limited; Defendant: Mabruki Samli Rajabu
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- suit struck out with costs
- Legal Topics
- Pleadings Formatting, Preliminary Objection, Amendment of Pleadings
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Parties
Afrisian Ginning Limited
Plaintiff
Mabruki Samli Rajabu
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaint's formatting contravenes Rule 19(1) of the High Court (Commercial Division) Procedure Rules, 2012
- 2 Whether amendment of the plaint is permissible after a preliminary objection is raised
Ratio Decidendi
The plaint was not in compliance with mandatory formatting requirements under Rule 19(1); amendment cannot be allowed once a preliminary objection is raised; suit must be struck out.
Court Disposition
suit struck out with costs
Orders
- Suit struck out with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment