namtumbo district council vs ms olina investments 2013 tzhc 2161 29 october 2013
The court held that since the parties agreed to resolve disputes by arbitration and the defendant/petitioner is ready and willing to submit to arbitration, there is no reason to refuse the application for stay. The dispute must be referred to arbitration as per the contract and statutory provisions.
- Citation
- namtumbo district council vs ms olina investments 2013 tzhc 2161 29 october 2013
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Namtumbo District Council; Defendant/petitioner: M/S Olina Investments
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Application for Stay of Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application for stay of proceedings granted.
- Legal Topics
- Agency Agreement, Arbitration Clause, Stay of Proceedings, Termination of Contract
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Namtumbo District Council
Plaintiff/respondent
M/S Olina Investments
Defendant/petitioner
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Application for Stay of Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proceedings should be stayed to allow arbitration as per contract clause
- 2 Whether termination of contract precludes arbitration
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that since the parties agreed to resolve disputes by arbitration and the defendant/petitioner is ready and willing to submit to arbitration, there is no reason to refuse the application for stay. The dispute must be referred to arbitration as per the contract and statutory provisions.
Court Disposition
Application for stay of proceedings granted.
Orders
- Proceedings in Civil Case No. 1 of 2013 stayed pending arbitration.
- No order for costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment