20151020 TZHC Iringa
The transaction between the first appellant and the second respondent constituted an equitable mortgage, and the Law of Limitation Act does not apply as there was no suit instituted; thus, the sale was not time barred and the appeal is allowed.
- Citation
- 20151020 TZHC Iringa
- Parties
- Appellant: Agricultural Inputs Trust Fund; Appellant: Another (Second Appellant); Respondent: Seraphina Kawage; Respondent: Second Respondent; Respondent: Third Respondent
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Land Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From District Land and Housing Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Mortgage, Limitation of Actions, Title to Land, Equitable Mortgage
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Agricultural Inputs Trust Fund
Appellant
Another (Second Appellant)
Appellant
Seraphina Kawage
Respondent
Second Respondent
Respondent
Third Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From District Land and Housing Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit premises was legally mortgaged
- 2 Whether the attachment and sale of the suit premises was lawful and not time barred
Ratio Decidendi
The transaction between the first appellant and the second respondent constituted an equitable mortgage, and the Law of Limitation Act does not apply as there was no suit instituted; thus, the sale was not time barred and the appeal is allowed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Decision of the District Land and Housing Tribunal quashed
- First and second respondents condemned to pay costs to the appellants in this Court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment