ahmed abdallah vs maulid athuman 2013 tzca 184 11 december 2013

ahmed abdallah vs maulid athuman 2013 tzca 184 11 december 2013

Applicant failed to satisfy the precondition of providing security for due performance of the decree as required under Rule 11(2)(d), thus stay of execution cannot be granted.

Citation
ahmed abdallah vs maulid athuman 2013 tzca 184 11 december 2013
Parties
Applicant: Ahmed Abdallah; Respondent: Maulid Athuman
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
11 December 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Security for Performance, Appeal Process
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ahmed Abdallah

Applicant

Maulid Athuman

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution

  1. 1 Whether the applicant satisfied the cumulative preconditions for grant of stay of execution under Rule 11(2)(d) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant failed to satisfy the precondition of providing security for due performance of the decree as required under Rule 11(2)(d), thus stay of execution cannot be granted.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Application dismissed with costs.