ahmed ally salim vs dr benedict mbawala 2022 tzhclandd 686 28 july 2022

The applicant failed to account for each day of delay and did not provide sufficient evidence or explanation for the prolonged delay after the previous application was struck out. The reasons advanced were not supported by evidence, and the application was therefore dismissed for lack of merit.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: ahmed ally salim vs dr benedict mbawala 2022 tzhclandd 686 28 july 2022
Parties: Applicant: Ahmed Ally Salim; Respondent: Dr. Benedict Mbawala
Court: TANZLII
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 28 July 2022
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome: Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Procedural Law, Delay and Good Cause
Source Language: english

Civil Procedure Land Law Extension of Time Leave to Appeal Procedural Law Delay and Good Cause

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2

Parties

Ahmed Ally Salim

Applicant

Dr. Benedict Mbawala

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

1 Whether the application for extension of time was brought under proper legal provisions
2 Whether the applicant demonstrated good cause for the delay in filing the application for leave to appeal

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

Application dismissed in its entirety with costs

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.