al kafil co ltd vs tanzania co ltd 2022 tzhccomd 321 21 september 2022

al kafil co ltd vs tanzania co ltd 2022 tzhccomd 321 21 september 2022

The court is satisfied that the deed of settlement lawfully settles the entire suit and must be recorded as a consent judgment under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
al kafil co ltd vs tanzania co ltd 2022 tzhccomd 321 21 september 2022
Parties
Plaintiff: AL KAFIL COMPANY LIMITED; Defendant: TANZANIA MEAT COMPANY LIMITED
Court
TZHCCOMD
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
21 September 2022
Procedural Posture
Commercial Case / Consent Judgment After Out of Court Settlement
Outcome
Suit marked settled out of court by consent judgment.
Legal Topics
Consent Judgment, Settlement, Breach of Contract
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Consent Judgment Settlement Breach of Contract

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

AL KAFIL COMPANY LIMITED

Plaintiff

TANZANIA MEAT COMPANY LIMITED

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Case / Consent Judgment After Out of Court Settlement

  1. 1 Whether the defendant breached the agreement
  2. 2 Whether the deed of settlement lawfully settles the dispute

Ratio Decidendi

The court is satisfied that the deed of settlement lawfully settles the entire suit and must be recorded as a consent judgment under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code.

Court Disposition

Suit marked settled out of court by consent judgment.

Orders

  • Deed of settlement registered and forms part of the consent judgment and decree.