said sobo 66 others vs al naeem enterprises ltd 2023 tzhcld 1133 28 february 2023

said sobo 66 others vs al naeem enterprises ltd 2023 tzhcld 1133 28 february 2023

Applicants failed to show sufficient cause for the delay, failed to account for each day of the two years and ten months' delay, and neither alleged illegality nor negligence of their representative constitutes a ground for extension of time. Application dismissed for want of merit.

Citation
said sobo 66 others vs al naeem enterprises ltd 2023 tzhcld 1133 28 february 2023
Parties
Applicants: Said Sobo & 66 Others; Respondent: Al-Naeem Enterprises Limited
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
28 February 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application for Extension of Time in Labour Dispute / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Unfair Termination, Representative Suits, Negligence of Advocate/personal Representative
Source Language
English
Labour Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Unfair Termination Representative Suits Negligence of Advocate/personal Representative

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 25 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Said Sobo & 66 Others

Applicants

Al-Naeem Enterprises Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application for Extension of Time in Labour Dispute / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether sufficient cause exists to grant extension of time to file revision against CMA award
  2. 2 Whether alleged illegality or negligence of personal representative constitutes good ground for extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

Applicants failed to show sufficient cause for the delay, failed to account for each day of the two years and ten months' delay, and neither alleged illegality nor negligence of their representative constitutes a ground for extension of time. Application dismissed for want of merit.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application for extension of time is dismissed for want of merit.