said sobo others vs al naeem enterprises ltd 2020 tzhcld 17 20 march 2020

The applicants demonstrated a common interest, provided evidence of appointment of representatives, and were present in court to confirm the authenticity of signatures. The court found no basis for the respondent's opposition and held that the applicants complied with the requirements for leave to file a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation: said sobo others vs al naeem enterprises ltd 2020 tzhcld 17 20 march 2020
Parties: Applicants: Said Sobo & 66 Others; Respondent: Al-Naeem Enterprises Limited
Court: TANZLII
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 20 March 2020
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Application (labour) / Application for Leave to File Representative Suit
Outcome: Application allowed
Legal Topics: Representative Suits, Leave to File Representative Action, Labour Disputes, Procedural Compliance
Source Language: english

Labour Law Representative Suits Leave to File Representative Action Labour Disputes Procedural Compliance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2

Parties

Said Sobo & 66 Others

Applicants

Al-Naeem Enterprises Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application (labour) / Application for Leave to File Representative Suit

Legal Issues

1 Whether the applicants have complied with the requirement of obtaining leave to file a representative suit under Rule 44(2) of the Labour Court Rules, 2007

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application allowed

Orders

Saidi Sobo and Rashid Huseni Lusian are granted leave to appear and be heard on behalf of 65 applicants on the intended revision application.
No order as to costs.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.