albert chabruma and 2 others vs china railway seventh group co ltd 2021 tzhcld 456 8 november 2021
The application was struck out because it was an omnibus application combining unrelated prayers, the affidavit was incurably defective for containing legal arguments and failing to comply with the mandatory format, and the overriding objective principle cannot cure these fundamental procedural defects.
- Citation
- albert chabruma and 2 others vs china railway seventh group co ltd 2021 tzhcld 456 8 november 2021
- Parties
- Applicant: Albert M. Chabruma; Applicant: Edward Cosmas Seww; Applicant: Hassan Risasi Haji; Respondent: China Railway Seventh Group Co. Ltd
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 8 November 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Revision / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Application struck out with costs
- Legal Topics
- Preliminary Objection, Affidavit Defects, Omnibus Application, Procedural Compliance
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Albert M. Chabruma
Applicant
Edward Cosmas Seww
Applicant
Hassan Risasi Haji
Applicant
China Railway Seventh Group Co. Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Labour Revision / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the affidavit in support of the application is incurably defective
- 2 Whether the application is bad in law for skipping the mandatory format required by law
- 3 Whether the application is incompetent for being an omnibus application
Ratio Decidendi
The application was struck out because it was an omnibus application combining unrelated prayers, the affidavit was incurably defective for containing legal arguments and failing to comply with the mandatory format, and the overriding objective principle cannot cure these fundamental procedural defects.
Court Disposition
Application struck out with costs
Orders
- The application is ruled incompetent and struck out with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment