alex msama mwita vs yusufu shabani omary three others 2023 tzhccomd 136 12 may 2023
Applicant failed to account for the delay and alleged illegality was not apparent on the face of the record; therefore, extension of time cannot be granted.
- Citation
- alex msama mwita vs yusufu shabani omary three others 2023 tzhccomd 136 12 may 2023
- Parties
- Applicant: Alex Msama Mwita; 1st Respondent: Yusufu Shabani Omary; 2nd Respondent: Bank of Africa (T) Limited; 3rd Respondent: Laura Boniventure Malya Masera; 4th Respondent: Tegemeze Auction Mart Limited
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Commercial Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Review, Execution of Court Orders, Illegality as Ground for Extension
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alex Msama Mwita
Applicant
Yusufu Shabani Omary
1st Respondent
Bank of Africa (T) Limited
2nd Respondent
Laura Boniventure Malya Masera
3rd Respondent
Tegemeze Auction Mart Limited
4th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Commercial Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has accounted for the delay in filing for review
- 2 Whether alleged illegality is apparent on the face of the record to justify extension of time
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant failed to account for the delay and alleged illegality was not apparent on the face of the record; therefore, extension of time cannot be granted.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- Application for extension of time dismissed
- Costs awarded to respondents
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment