freeman aikael mbowe another vs alex o lema 2001 tzca 6 20 september 2001
Article 83(4) of the Constitution does not grant a right of appeal as of right against every decision of the High Court in election petition cases; it applies only to final decisions determining the legality of an election or vacancy of a parliamentary seat. Interlocutory decisions that do not finally determine the matter are not appealable as of right under article 83(4) and require leave under section 5(1) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act.
- Citation
- freeman aikael mbowe another vs alex o lema 2001 tzca 6 20 september 2001
- Parties
- First Appellant: Freeman Aikaeli Mbowe; Second Appellant: Attorney General; Respondent: Alex O Lema
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 20 September 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Legal Issue by Full Bench, Referral Back to Full Court for Determination of Appeal
- Outcome
- Matter referred back to the Full Court for the appeal to be dealt with in the usual manner; appeal from the interlocutory decision is governed by section 5(1) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, not article 83(4) of the Constitution.
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Interlocutory Orders, Appeals in Election Petitions, Interpretation of Constitution, Appellate Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Freeman Aikaeli Mbowe
First Appellant
Attorney General
Second Appellant
Alex O Lema
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Legal Issue by Full Bench, Referral Back to Full Court for Determination of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether article 83(4) of the Constitution grants a right of appeal as of right against any decision of the High Court in election petition cases, including interlocutory orders
- 2 Whether the interlocutory decision of the High Court in this case is appealable as of right or only with leave
Ratio Decidendi
Article 83(4) of the Constitution does not grant a right of appeal as of right against every decision of the High Court in election petition cases; it applies only to final decisions determining the legality of an election or vacancy of a parliamentary seat. Interlocutory decisions that do not finally determine the matter are not appealable as of right under article 83(4) and require leave under section 5(1) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act.
Court Disposition
Matter referred back to the Full Court for the appeal to be dealt with in the usual manner; appeal from the interlocutory decision is governed by section 5(1) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, not article 83(4) of the Constitution.
Orders
- Matter sent back to the Full Court for determination of the appeal in the usual manner.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment