alhaji rajabu ukwaju vs benjamin makuka 2006 tzhc 110 20 july 2006
Failure to show the name of the magistrate who signed the affidavit renders it defective, but the defect may be cured by amendment in the interest of justice.
- Citation
- alhaji rajabu ukwaju vs benjamin makuka 2006 tzhc 110 20 july 2006
- Parties
- Applicant: Alhaji Rajabu Ukwaju; Respondent: Benjamin Makuka
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Application allowed to be amended
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Affidavit Attestation, Preliminary Objection
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Parties
Alhaji Rajabu Ukwaju
Applicant
Benjamin Makuka
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether failure to cite specific legal provisions renders the application incompetent
- 2 Whether an affidavit is defective for not showing the name of the magistrate or commissioner for oaths who attested it
Ratio Decidendi
Failure to show the name of the magistrate who signed the affidavit renders it defective, but the defect may be cured by amendment in the interest of justice.
Court Disposition
Application allowed to be amended
Orders
- Applicant permitted to amend and file a proper affidavit within fourteen days from the date of the ruling
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment