20130319 TZCA Mwanza
- Citation
- 20130319 TZCA Mwanza
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZCA
- Decision
- 19 March 2013
- Posture
- Civil Appeal / Order on Preliminary Objection Regarding Competency
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZCA
- Decision
- 19 March 2013
- Posture
- Civil Appeal / Order on Preliminary Objection Regarding Competency
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The appeal is incompetent for lack of a drawn order and absence of a certificate of delay from the District Registrar; therefore, it must be struck out.
Court disposition
appeal struck out for incompetence
Orders
- appeal struck out
- no order as to costs
02
Material facts
Parties
Alli Chamani
AppellantKaragwe District Council
Respondent Counsel: Mr. Aloyce MbonitoColumbus Paul
Respondent Counsel: Mr. Aaron Kabunga03
Procedural history
Posture
Civil Appeal / Order on Preliminary Objection Regarding Competency
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the appeal is competent in the absence of a drawn order and certificate of delay
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The appellant conceded that the appeal was incompetent for not being accompanied by a drawn order and for lack of a certificate from the District Registrar regarding exclusion of time.
- Respondent
- The second respondent had no objection to the application to strike out the appeal but prayed for costs, leaving the matter to the discretion of the Court.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Court of Appeal Rules
An appeal must be accompanied by a drawn order as required by Rule 96(1)(h).
- 02
Court of Appeal Rules
A certificate of delay from the District Registrar is required to rely on Rule 90(1) for exclusion of time.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The appeal is incompetent for lack of a drawn order and absence of a certificate of delay from the District Registrar; therefore, it must be struck out.
Court disposition
appeal struck out for incompetence
- appeal struck out
- no order as to costs
Source and reliance status
TZCA · 19 March 2013
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZCA
Judgment· 19 March 2013
; ' ·,
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA
ATMWANZA (CORAM: MBAROUK, J.A., BWANA, J.A., And MUSSA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 57 OF 2012 ALLI CHAMANI •••••••••••••••••••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• APPELLA.NT
VERSUS 1. KARAGWE DISTRICT COUNCIL } 2. COLUMBUS PAUL - ................... ~··········RESPONDENTS (Appeal from the decision of the High Court of Tanzania at Bukoba) (Mjemmas, J.) dated the 11th day of May, 2011 in Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 21 of 2009
ORDER OF THE COURT MUSSA, J.A.: When the matter came for hearing today, the appellant, appeared in person. The second respondent had the services of Mr. Aaron Kabunga who was also holding brief for Mr. Aloyce Mbonito, learned senior state attorney for the first respondent. Upon the court raising the issue of the competency of the appeal, the appellant conceded before us that, indeed, the appeal was incompetent for not being accompanied by a drawn order and for lack of a certificate from the District Registrar with respect to exclusion of time required for the preparation of the record. To this application Mr. Kabunga had no objection except that he prayed for costs, a matter which he left for the discretion of the Court. For our part we. are satisfied that the appeal is incompetent for lack of a drawn order as required by Rule 96(1) (h). Likewise, the appellant has not shown entitlement to rely on the provisions of Rule 90(1) much as there is no certificate of delay from the District Registrar. On the premises, the appeal is struck out for incompetence but given the circumstances of the matter; we give no order for costs. DATED at MWANZA this 19th day of March, 2013. S. J. MBAROUK
JUSTICE OF APPEAL S. J. BWANA
JUSTICE OF APPEAL K. M. MUSSA
JUSTICE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. --· -- 1 ~ - - P. W. BAMPIKYA \t i SENIOR DEPUTY REGISTRAR \\W.. t·<;,. COURT OF APPEAL •~,, ( ~"'-'!:'., __ __,,,... 7'·/ ',, '",~'"-. ..r: ,...,.,,,·;"' . ,~,.~.;;-~--~-_;;;;.,.;;;.:~ 2
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.